Student evaluations of faculty: Concerns raised in the literature, and possible solutions.

94 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance (2017, background): “Adams (1997) mentioned many problems with the use of SETs that have since appeared in the literature such as validity, reliability, gender bias, and a number of other related issues (Beecham, 2009; Boring, Ottoboni, & Stark, 2016; Braga, Paccagnella, & Pellizzari, 2014; Hoefer, Yurkiewicz, & Byrne, ”
On Students’ (Mis)judgments of Learning and Teaching Effectiveness (2020, methodology): “Thus, t has been argued that student evaluations should never be the ole measure of teaching effectiveness, and alternatives to these easures should be used as well (Emery et al., 2003; Koon & urray, 1995; Wright, 2006).”
Student evaluations of teaching: perceptions of faculty based on gender, position, and rank (2010, background): “As Wright (2006) pointed out, anonymous SETs were created with positive intent.”