Continuing Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System

By Herbert G. Heneman III, Anthony T. Milanowski. 2003

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bb3e6eca0b66ed65be3cd41c5250ef649181ec0b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Charalambos Y. Charalambous
2. H. Hill
3. M. Kraft
4. Anthony T. Milanowski
5. Y. Copur-Gencturk
6. Deborah Loewenberg Ball
7. David Blazar
8. Steven M. Kimball

In Information Systems and Management

1. H. Hill
2. M. Kraft
3. Charalambos Y. Charalambous
4. Anthony T. Milanowski
5. Steven M. Kimball
6. David Blazar
7. Sarah Archibald
8. Jonah E. Rockoff

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. (2012, background): “It also modified training to include more time and a greater focus on identifying sources of disagreement between observers (Heneman & Milanowski, 2003).”
• When Rater Reliability Is Not Enough (2012, background): “Further, we observe that when rater quality is examined, many practitioners (and researchers) report only rater agreement levels with one another—that is, interrater reliability (see, e.g., Heneman & Milanowski, 2003, about Cincinnati; Sartain, Stoelinga, & Brown, 2009, about Chicago).”