Two Strategies for Inductive Reasoning in Organizational Research

By Mikko Ketokivi, Saku Mantere. 2010

414 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/baa11a9af47a0b05737b9db17b363c7734e087a8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Joep Cornelissen
2. Sarah Kaplan
3. Michael G. Pratt
4. Rodolphe Durand
5. Vesa Peltokorpi
6. Eero Vaara

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Sarah Kaplan
2. Richard Whittington
3. Michael G. Pratt
4. Rodolphe Durand
5. Joep Cornelissen
6. Vesa Peltokorpi
7. Eero Vaara
8. Ann Langley

In Strategy and Management

1. Michael G. Pratt
2. Richard Whittington
3. Rodolphe Durand
4. Joep Cornelissen
5. Sarah Kaplan
6. Vesa Peltokorpi
7. Eero Vaara
8. Mary Tripsas

Citations in the corpus

• Moving Forward: Developing Theoretical Contributions in Management Studies (2014, background): “It is thus helpful, we believe, to distinguish between cognitive reasoning on the one hand and logical forms of reasoning on the other: the first refers to our cognitive processes and inferential work in action, whereas the latter concerns, strictly speaking, rhetoric and forms of logic and justific”
• Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: Productive and counterproductive effects of language-sensitive recruitment (2014, methodology): “In our study we used an empirical contextualization strategy (Ketokivi & Mantere, 2010) in which the research context is considered to be of interest, rather than a limitation.”
• Achieving Rigor in Qualitative Analysis: The Role of Active Categorization in Theory Building (2020, neutral): “Other researchers might view the same data very differently: as we know, many valuable insights emerge from the interaction of different individuals in distinct fields (An-teby, 2013; de Rond & Tunc¸alp, 2017; Hudson & Okhuysen, 2014; Ketokivi & Mantere, 2010; Louis & Bartunek, 1992).”
• Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research* (2019, result): “, conducting the same study but with a new sample/dataset) or by attempting to reproduce identical findings using the same data and procedures as the initial study (Ketokivi and Mantere, 2010; Goodman, Fanelli, and Ioannidis, 2016).”