Predictors used for personnel selection: An overview of constructs, methods and techniques.

By Jesús Salgado, C. Viswesvaran, Deniz S. Ones. 2001

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ba3311cd4c096f433689e059835ca617b8edfc26

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Marketing

1. Philip Bobko
2. Philip L. Roth
3. Michael A. McDaniel
4. Lynn A. McFarland
5. Deborah L. Whetzel

Citations in the corpus

• Situational judgment tests: An overview of current research (2009, background): “32) was contrary to claims by Sternberg and the Rainbow Project Collaborators (2002) that the CSQ and other tacit knowledge measures are not cognitively loaded, but are measure of “practical know-how.”
• A META‐ANALYSIS OF WORK SAMPLE TEST VALIDITY: UPDATING AND INTEGRATING SOME CLASSIC LITERATURE (2005, methodology): “First, the Hunters explicitly re-analyzed the studies of Asher and Sciarrino as stated in the previous paragraph (see also the thorough work of Salgado, Viswesvaran, and Ones (2001), for a current example of the prominence of Asher & Sciarrino).”
• Subgroup Differences in Situational Judgment Test Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2008, background): “Second, because SJTs describe work-related situations, these measures are often viewed as having both face and content validity (Chan & Schmitt, 1997; Motowidlo, Hanson, & Crafts, 1997; Salgado et al., 2001).”