Fostering Innovation in Public Services

By D. Albury. 2005

366 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b966104d133c98c816851c4d6c026a0c246d4eac

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. J. Hartley
2. A. Arundel
3. M. Moore
4. Jason Potts
5. T. Kastelle
6. Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie
7. K. Hussinger
8. Gaétan de Rassenfosse

In Strategy and Management

1. Jason Potts
2. A. Arundel
3. J. Hartley
4. Carter Bloch
5. T. Kastelle
6. M. Moore
7. Sang M. Lee
8. B. Ferguson

Citations in the corpus

• Public sector innovation research: What’s next? (2010, background): “Two defining assumptions in the literature on public sector innovation (e.g. Grady 1992, Borins 2001, Walker 2003, Albury 2005, Hartley 2005, Mulgan 2007, Windrum and Koch 2008, Maddock 2008) are that: (a) the public sector suffers an innovation deficit or challenge, i.e. it is less innovative than…”
• The innovation deficit in public services: The curious problem of too much efficiency and not enough waste and failure (2009, background): “The incentives and outcomes in the ‘production of public services’ industry (i.e. government) in stable modern ‘rule of law’ democracies are now often efficient, transparent and accountable, yet the incentives and outcomes to innovation remain exceedingly poor (Albury 2005).”
• Innovations in governance (2008, background): “…IN GOVERNANCE AS AN EMERGING RESEARCH AGENDA Recently, there has been a great deal of both professional and scholarly interest in ‘‘innovation’’ in the public sector (Altschuler and Behn 1997; Borins 1998; Hartley 2005; Moore 2005, Mulgan and Albury 2003; Albury 2005; National Audit Office 2006).”
• Open innovation in the public sector of leading countries (2012, background): “The government can solve problems faster and accurately by harnessing a collaborative network of citizen experts (Albury, 2005; Arganoff, 2007).”
• Advancing innovation in the public sector: Aligning innovation measurement with policy goals (2019, background): “Risk-averse conditions can be created by political damage to elected officials from media scrutiny of failed policies (Albury, 2005; Borins, 2001; Potts and Kastelle, 2010), reputational risks for managers (Pärna and von Tunzelmann, 2007) and self-selection effects whereby risk-averse individuals…”