Pleasure and pressure based prosocial motivation: Divergent relations to subjective well-being.
By Jochen E. Gebauer, M. Riketta, Philip Broemer, G. Maio. 2008
154 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b93494d13bbc6d301fbc92520acce4d36c25b49f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Anders Dysvik
- B. Kuvaas
- Adam M. Grant
- Susan J. Ashford
- Kathryn Dekas
- Samir Nurmohamed
- Won‐Moo Hur
- Daniel Västfjäll
In Social Psychology
- Anders Dysvik
- B. Kuvaas
- Adam M. Grant
- Susan J. Ashford
- Sharon K. Parker
- Kathryn Dekas
- Samir Nurmohamed
- Won‐Moo Hur
Citations in the corpus
- The Normative Social Influence on Eco-Friendly Consumer Behavior: The Moderating Effect of Environmental Marketing Claims (2012, background): “For example, Jones and Dunlap (1992) and Van Liere and Dunlap (1980) have examined the relationship between environmental concern and demographic factors such as age, income, and education, and Fransson and Gärling (1999) and Schultz (2001) have investigated the structure and measurement of environm”
- The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations (2011, background): “Our measures of controlled motivation focused on the external form because it is the most controlled of all motivations (e.g., Gagné & Deci, 2005; Gebauer et al., 2008), which prevents us from drawing inferences about”
- Perceived investment in employee development, intrinsic motivation and work performance (2009, background): “Then, prosocial motivation will be better characterised as pressure-based and involving ought representations (Gebauer et al., 2008), and possibly result in stress and role overload (Bolino and Turnley, 2005) and other psychological costs that may impede or diminish any positive effects on work perf”
- Attitudes and Donation Behavior When Reading Positive and Negative Charity Appeals (2018, background): “There was neither any main effect nor any interaction effect for individual differences in pleasure-based motivation (Gebauer et al., 2008), self-rated religiosity, favorability toward a rational thinking style, or favorability toward an intuitive thinking style (Björklund & Bäckström, 2008;…”