The influence of executive cognition on competitive dynamics

By Jeremy J. Marcel, Pamela S. Barr, Irene M. Duhaime. 2011

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Safety Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b73f88a3230812bc0bf17a4952b288295b04ea6c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Giovanni Gavetti
2. Jeffrey A. Martin
3. William Ocasio
4. David Miller
5. Constance E. Helfat
6. Daniel A. Levinthal
7. Sucheta Nadkarni
8. Jianhong Chen

In Safety Research

1. William Ocasio
2. Giovanni Gavetti
3. Henrich R. Greve
4. Daniel A. Levinthal
5. Constance E. Helfat
6. Jeffrey A. Martin
7. Sucheta Nadkarni
8. Teppo Felin

In Strategy and Management

1. Giovanni Gavetti
2. William Ocasio
3. Henrich R. Greve
4. Constance E. Helfat
5. Daniel A. Levinthal
6. Jeffrey A. Martin
7. Sucheta Nadkarni
8. David Miller

Citations in the corpus

• The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects (2012, background): “Relatedly, Marcel, Barr, and Duhaime ( 2011 ) examine how executive's cognitive orientations combine with environmental cues to shape organizational attention, interpretation, and response to rivals in the airline industry.”
• Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: : A multidimensional framework (2015, background): “…© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. strategy and organization such as entrepreneurship (Markman and Phan, 2011), social identity theory (Livengood and Reger, 2010), executive cognition (Marcel, Barr, and Duhaime, 2011), and temporary advantage (D’Aveni, Dagnino, and Smith, 2010).”
• Dynamic Managerial Capabilities (2015, background): “…(Mitchell et al., 2011), perception of strategic issues as more controllable was associated with introduction of more new products and services (Thomas et al., 1993), and perceptions of causal links involving competitor actions was related to responses to those actions (Marcel et al., 2011).”
• The clock is ticking! Executive temporal depth, industry velocity, and competitive aggressiveness (2016, background): “We lagged the yearly competitive aggressiveness measure behind the executive temporal depth by one year to ensure that executive temporal depth existed prior to the initiation of competitive actions, rather than ex post (Marcel et al., 2011).”
• Time delays, competitive interdependence, and firm performance (2017, background): “E-mail: jukka.luoma@aalto.fi Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and Staw, 2010; Marcel, Barr, and Duhaime, 2010), recognizing that managers must make decisions concerning rivalry in the absence of a clear understanding of how their firm’s competitive actions translate into performance…”