Formal mentoring programs: The relationship of program design and support to mentors’ perceptions of benefits and costs
By Mark Parise, Monica L. Forret. 2008
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b651142b1cb1fb3ca0b93c48838f2d1f4071e6bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Safety Research
In Social Psychology
- Rajashi Ghosh
- Vanessa E. Cornelius
- Jennifer W. M. Lai
- Thomas G. Reio Jr.
- L. Wood
- B. Shuck
- Emily M. Grossnickle
Citations in the corpus
- Career benefits associated with mentoring for mentors: A meta-analysis (2013, background): “…1990; Liu, Liu, Kwan, & Mao, 2009; Salami, 2010), and two studies examining mentor outcomes were excluded for not providing any information on effect size for associations between provision or quality of mentoring and mentor's career outcome variables (e.g., Collins, 1994; Parise & Forret, 2008).”
- Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education (2016, methodology): “The questions were adapted and modified from studies including Allen et al. (2006), Boyer et al. (2010), Gannon and Maher (2012), Hamlin and Sage (2011), Hammond et al. (2010), Johnson (2007), Parise and Forret (2008) and Ragins et al. (2000).”
- An Ecological Systems Perspective on Mentoring at Work: A Review and Future Prospects (2011, unknown): “Some studies examining organizational-level factors (Allen, Eby, & Lentz, 2006 ; Murrell, Forte-Trammell, & Bing, 2009 ; Parise & Forrett, 2008 ) suggest implications for effectively designing programs.”