Coaches and cohesion: the impact of coaching techniques on team cohesion in the small group sport setting.
By Paul D. Turman. 2003
186 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b607b1c4b27dc1dde5fefe789989bbddce37bb11
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Merce Mach
- Jeffrey W. Kassing
- Jean‐Philippe Heuzé
- Shimon L. Dolan
- P. Sarrazin
- M. Masiero
- Andrew C. Billings
- Nicolas Raimbault
Citations in the corpus
- The Relationships of Perceived Motivational Climate to Cohesion and Collective Efficacy in Elite Female Teams (2006, methodology): “The variables characterizing a task-involving atmosphere were found to sustain cohesion in previous studies (see Carron & Hausenblas, 1998) whereas inequity, favoritism to a particular athlete or group within the team were perceived as coaches’ behaviors deterring team cohesion and unity (Turman, 20”
- The differential effect of team members' trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion (2010, background): “In this sense, observers of the sporting world (Turman, 2003) often ask why a team that has successfully performed one year may not repeat the same success the following season or vice versa.”
- Communication in the Community of Sport: The Process of Enacting, (Re)Producing, Consuming, and Organizing Sport (2004, background): “Turman (2003a) suggested that coaches’ levels of experience and the time in the season influences athletes’ preferences for and perceptions of their coaches’ instructional strategies.”