The origin of corporate social responsibility: global forces or national legacies?

By Maria Gjølberg. 2009

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b46930126795f1da26aa87bdd020fd58b266809a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Corporate Social Responsibility and Institutional Theory: New Perspectives on Private Governance (2012, background): “Turning to the aspect of diversity, quite a number of publications which have applied institutional theory to the study of CSR are interested in understanding cross-national variations of CSR practices (Gjolberg, 2009; Blasco and Zolner, 2010; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010).”
Institutional legitimacy and norms-based CSR marketing practices: Insights from MNCs operating in a developing economy (2015, background): “Therefore, the solely economic approach to CSR fails to take into account the variations in CSR marketing practices across different institutional contexts (e.g. Blasco and Zølner, 2010; Bondy et al., 2012; Brammer et al., 2012; Chapple and Moon, 2005; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010; ”
From Typology to Taxonomy: A Configurational Analysis of National Business Systems and their Explanatory Power (2014, methodology): “While still a relatively new technique, QCA has therefore increasingly been used in analyses of institutional regimes and their outcomes (e.g., Boyer, 2004; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson, 2005; Kogut & Ragin, 2006; Kvist, 2007; Pajunen, 2008; Schneider et al., 2010).”
Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka (2015, positive): “…and approaches to legitimacy-seeking in the context of CSR practices of MNE subsidiaries through detailed case studies (Chapple & Moon 2007) differentiating between industrial sectors (Jackson and Apostolakou 2010) and political cultures (Gjolberg 2009) prevalent across different countries.”
Corporate Social Responsibility in Challenging and Non-enabling Institutional Contexts: Do Institutional Voids matter? (2014, positive): “strong government, market and civil society (Matten and Moon 2008; Aguilera and Jackson 2003; Gjolberg 2009; Husted and Allen 2006; Langlois and Schlegelmilch 1990; Maignan and Ralston 2002; Muller 2006).”
‘Free Us Up So We Can Be Responsible!’ The Co-Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism in the UK, 1977-2010 (2012, background): “A growing literature does address CSR’s institutional determinants (Campbell, 2006; Midttun et al., 2006; Matten and Moon, 2008; Gjølberg, 2009; Jackson and Apostolakou, 2010) as well as its historical evolution (Frederick, 2006; Carroll, 2008; Moon et al., 2010).”
Effects of corporate social responsibility on customer satisfaction and organizational attractiveness: A signaling perspective (2019, positive): “The enactment of CSR is dependent on the cultural and po‐ litical context, wherein a firm operates (Dhanesh, 2015; Gjølberg, 2009; McNamara et al., 2017; Zhao, Chen, & Xiong, 2016).”
ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented (2016, positive): “This conclusion aligns with that of Gjølberg (2009) about CSR.”