Attachment and Exploration in Adults: Chronic and Contextual Accessibility

By Jeffrey D. Green, W. Keith Campbell. 2000

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b36ff7742b54c854089a8e7eb1dc229d1c76151e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Good News! Capitalizing on Positive Events in an Interpersonal Context (2010, background): “Indeed the few studies that have examined attachment-related processes in nonstressful times have found that attachment figures also play an important role in exploration (e.g., Elliot & Reis, 2003; Feeney, 2004; Green & Campbell, 2000).”
Moving Toward a Secure Attachment Style: Can Repeated Security Priming Help? (2008, background): “Past research has shown that contextual activation of attachment security is associated with a more positive mood (e.g., Mikulincer et al., 2001) and better functioning of other behavioral systems (e.g., caregiving: Mikulincer et al., 2005; exploration: Green & Campbell, 2000).”
Exploring Nostalgia's Influence on Psychological Growth (2014, methodology): “First, we included the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory (CEI-II; Kashdan et al., 2009) to assess growth-oriented self-perceptions.”
Attachment theory at work: A review and directions for future research (2018, background): “Secure attachment has been found to predict curiosity (Mikulincer, 1997), novelty seeking (Carnelley & Ruscher, 2000), and exploratory interest (Green & Campbell, 2000) in adults.”
Attachment to objects as compensation for close others' perceived unreliability (2012, methodology): “First, our manipulation more clearly represents a manipulation of attachment anxiety because, much like attachment anxiety manipulations used in other research (e.g., Green & Campbell, 2000), it primes thoughts that close others are unreliable in times of need.”
Mnemic neglect: Selective amnesia of one’s faults (2016, background): “The attachment security that one derives from partners is conducive to energy (Luke, Sedikides, & Carnelley, 2012), cognitive openness (Mikulincer & Arad, 1999), and environmental exploration (Green & Campbell, 2000).”
Leadership Across Cultures: Attachment Style Influences (2003, background): “In an interesting variant on research on attachment style categorization, adults &dquo;primed&dquo; with statements about secure attachment were more open to explore new experiences and novel stimuli than those &dquo;primed&dquo; with statements about insecure attachment (Green and Campbell, 2000).”
Attachment-related psychodynamics (2002, background): “…ed by self-report measures and as compared with relatively insecure individuals, have exhibited high levels of cognitive openness and have readily revised faulty knowledge in the face of new evidence (Green & Campbell, 2000; Green-Hennessy & Reis, 1998; Mikulincer, 1997; Mikulincer & Arad, 1999).”
The role of mentalizing and epistemic trust in the therapeutic relationship. (2014, background): “The predictors of secure attachment relationships are essentially also ostensive communication cues.”
Exploratory Orientation as an Educational Goal (2006, background): “E-mail: flum@bgu.ac.il those who report secure attachment (e.g., Green & Campbell, 2000).”
Meta-Analytic Studies of Identity Status and the Relational Issues of Attachment and Intimacy (2009, background): “It has been suggested, however, that men and women follow different pathways in identity development, and that Erikson’s descriptions of identity and intimacy development might be normative for men, but not for women (e.g., Franz & White, 1985; Gilligan, 1982; Hodgson & Fischer, 1979).”
Filling the Void (2014, unknown): “For them, projecting a functional (albeit fragile) sense of self-sufficiency is chronically activated (cf. Green & Campbell, 2000; Mikulincer, 1998b; see Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007, table 7.1), which is likely to make their partner’s role in their personal and independent pursuits more mentally…”