Attachment-related psychodynamics
By Phillip R. Shaver, Mario Mikulincer. Attachment & Human Development, 2002
1,320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c4a875eb4736d6ad85432b65b37762768381d79d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Meifen Wei
- Robyn A. Zakalik
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- Daniel W. Russell
- D. Vogel
- S. Beach
- Bart Soenens
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- M. Del Giudice
- Meifen Wei
- Reinhard Pekrun
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Jeffry A. Simpson
- Markus A. Maier
- Mario Mikulincer
- Bart Soenens
In Social Psychology
- Meifen Wei
- Phillip R. Shaver
- Mario Mikulincer
- Constantine Sedikides
- T. Wildschut
- Robyn A. Zakalik
- D. Vogel
- Jeffry A. Simpson
Citations in the corpus
- Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: a person x situation perspective. (2007, background): “In some respects, this resembles the reduction in prosocial behavior following social exclusion (Twenge, Baumeister, DeWall, Ciarocco, & Bartels, 2007) and the dismissive behavior reported by attachment theorists (e.g., Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002).”
- Patterns of Attachment and Emotional Competence in Middle Childhood (2011, neutral): “Shaver and Mikulincer (2002) and Mikulincer, Shaver, & Pereg (2003) presented what is currently the most thoroughly articulated theoretical model of emotion regulation from an attachment perspective.”
- Elaborating on elaborations: role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. (2006, background): “Issues of measurement are critical here, as there are ongoing controversies over narrative versus questionnaire measures of attachment, as well as whether one is assessing maternal representations of childhood attachment or current romantic partners (e.g., Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002).”
- Insecure attachment and personality disorder: a twin study of adults (2007, result): “Furthermore, defensive strategies and unconscious processes expected in attachment theory have been associated with self-reported attachment styles in recent experimental studies (e.g. Mikulincer, Dolev, & Shaver, 2004; Mikulincer, Gillath, & Shaver, 2002; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002).”
- Pathways between attachment and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of rumination, empathy, and forgiveness (2014, background): “…and fear of rejection or abandonment; people with anxious attachment use ruminative coping strategies when they experience attachment threats or are overwhelmed by negative emotions about relational difficulties (Burnette et al., 2009; Mikulincer, Shaver, & Pereg, 2003; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002).”
- Linking adult attachment to self-esteem stability (2007, background): “For instance, insecure attachment relates to heightened aggression (e.g., Bookwala & Zdaniuk, 1998 ).”
- Of Memes and Marriage: Toward a Positive Relationship Science (2010, methodology): “Building on Bowlby’s (1969) conceptualization of attachment processes over the life span, Shaver and Mikulincer (2002, 2008) developed a model of attachment system activation and deactivation that has the potential to be very useful to researchers developing a positive psychology of relationships.”
- The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-Short Form: Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure (2007, neutral): “Pietromonaco & Feldman Barrett, 2000; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002 ).”
- Mental Representations of Attachment Security: Theoretical Foundation for a Positive Social Psychology. (2005, background): “Based on an extensive review of adult attachment studies, we (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2003; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002) proposed a model of the functioning and dynamics of the attachment system in adulthood.”
- An attachment perspective on human–pet relationships: Conceptualization and assessment of pet attachment orientations (2011, background): “According to attachment theory, differences in attachment orientations are evident in a person’s mental representations of others (Bowlby, 1973; Shaver & Hazan, 1993; Shaver & Mikulincer, 2002), which Bowlby called internal working models of others.”