Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967–2005

By Mary B. Dunn, Candace Jones. 2010

832 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, General Health Professions, Health Information Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b36d51023c6e4bc8646faecc50cef03ba76d4c1f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Marc Orlitzky
2. J. Almandoz
3. William Ocasio
4. Michael Lounsbury
5. Rodolphe Durand
6. Igor Filatotchev
7. Ruth V. Aguilera

In General Health Professions

1. Marc Orlitzky
2. A. Nicholls
3. J. Almandoz
4. Michael Lounsbury
5. Ruth V. Aguilera
6. B. Huybrechts

In Health Information Management

1. Marc Orlitzky
2. J. Almandoz
3. Michael Lounsbury

Citations in the corpus

• Founding Teams as Carriers of Competing Logics (2014, background): “For example, Dunn and Jones (2010) examined the conflict in health education between the ‘‘logic of care’’ and the ‘‘logic of science,’’ which creates tensions about how to train future professionals.”
• An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations (2016, background): “…date have focused on how different institutional logics manifested at the field level (e.g., health care, mutual fund, higher education publishing etc.) shape individual and organizational cognitions, identities and actions (e.g., Dunn and Jones, 2010; Lounsbury, 2007; Thornton and Ocasio, 1999).”
• Jules or Jim: Alternative Conformity to Minority Logics (2012, background): “Even more than in resource dependence theory, conformity is conceived of as a constraint (Oliver, 1991, 1997) that depends on the variety and prevalence of institutional logics (e.g., Dunn & Jones, 2010) more than on the agendas of individual selfinterested actors.”
• Green entrepreneurship in the sharing economy: utilising multiplicity of institutional logics (2019, background): “Co-existence of institutional logics, rather than dominance of particular logic within the field, has been documented well by institutional scholars (e.g. Dunn and Jones 2010; Jarzabkowski et al. 2013; Reay and Hinings 2009; Schneiberg and Clemens 2006).”
• Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: Organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance (2016, background): “During the last decade, the institutional literature has shown that organizations operate in pluralistic environments, characterized by multiple, competing, and often contradictory institutional logics (Dunn and Jones, 2010; Greenwood et al., 2010; Lounsbury, 2007).”
• Sustaining Inter-organizational Relationships Across Institutional Logics and Power Asymmetries: The Case of Fair Trade (2016, background): “…various ways have been observed through which conflicting logics can be sustained by field members: via hybridization within a given profession (Dunn and Jones 2010) or organizational form (Battilana and Dorado 2010; Tracey et al. 2011); by particular field members invoking distinctiveness…”
• Institutional Logics in the Study of Organizations: The Social Construction of the Relationship between Corporate Social and Financial Performance (2011, background): “Institutional logics are defined as “cultural beliefs and rules that shape the cognitions and behaviors of actors” (Dunn & Jones, 2010: 114).”
• Corporate Governance and Investors' Perceptions of Foreign IPO Value: An Institutional Perspective (2014, background): “In addition, when seeking to exploit overseas capital markets, foreign IPO firms are exposed to potentially different institutional logics, or sets of “beliefs and rules that shape the cognitions and behaviors of actors” (Dunn & Jones, 2010: 114), in their home and host countries.”