An institutional logics approach to social entrepreneurship: Market logic, religious diversity, and resource acquisition by microfinance organizations
By Michael Lounsbury. 2016
200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ec51138e5bd5f64ababa84e6019d3aabd63b2744
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- T. Williams
- Dean A. Shepherd
- G. Fisher
- Danny Miller
- Michael Lounsbury
- Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
- Gerard George
- Jeffery S. McMullen
In Economics and Econometrics
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Danny Miller
- Simon J. D. Schillebeeckx
- G. Fisher
- R. Merrill
- Michael Lounsbury
- Gerard George
- T. Williams
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Danny Miller
- T. Williams
- G. Fisher
- Gerard George
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Michael Lounsbury
- Kathleen M. Sutcliffe
- W. Wales
Citations in the corpus
- Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management (2017, background): “Going beyond earlier efforts to highlight how actors differentially react to normative pressures (Oliver, 1991) or create new norms, research on institutional logics has highlighted the prevalence of multiple, sometimes competing, norms and associated pressures, and has directed attention toward how”
- Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises (2018, unknown): “…toward the important role of regulatory, political, and institutional forces in shaping the acquisition of resources by social ventures (Desa, 2012; Zhao & Lounsbury, 2016) and how formal (e.g., strong property rights) and informal (e.g., societal collectivism) institutions affect the emergence of…”
- Organizational response to adversity: Fusing crisis management and resilience research streams (2017, background): “…their simultaneous pursuit of different and oftentimes competing missions, these organizations tend to experience divergent pressures from different stakeholders and face unique challenges in managing the associated complexity (Besharov & Smith, 2014; Pache & Santos, 2013; Zhao & Lounsbury, 2016).”
- Digital Sustainability and Entrepreneurship: How Digital Innovations Are Helping Tackle Climate Change and Sustainable Development (2020, background): “(Continued) interesting questions as to how organizations deal with conflicting logics ( Purdy & Gray, 2009; Zhao & Lounsbury, 2016 ), how external audiences evaluate partial category membership (Durand & Paolella, 2013; Hsu et al., 2009), and how actors whose activities are fully embedded within…”