Interpersonal relationships in sport: Uncharted territory in sport psychology research.
By P. Wylleman. 2000
125 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b292dcb5202f3a1379a48afc0598e4f1f5082b85
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Jowett
- Marc-André K. Lafrenière
- Robert J. Vallerand
- D. Lavallee
- Daragh Sheridan
- Noémie Carbonneau
- J. Adie
- P. Coffee
Citations in the corpus
- A systematic review of social support in youth sport (2014, background): “In more recent years, the literature has included several publications on social support and interpersonal relationships in sport (Jowett & Lavallee, 2007; Lavallee & Wylleman, 2000; Smith & Bar-Eli, 2007).”
- Predictors of Antisocial and Prosocial Behavior in an Adolescent Sports Context (2011, methodology): “…and acceptance of individual differences (e.g., in ability) and emotions (e.g., sadness and joy during the game) are core elements of coach-athlete relationships that are based on relational support (Poczwardowski, Barott, & Henschen, 2002; Vanden Auweele & Rzewnicki, 2000; Wylleman, 2000).”
- A developmental perspective on transitions faced by athletes (2004, background): “Although the parents-coach relationship has largely been neglected as a topic of study (Wylleman, 2000), some research has shed light on the way in which parent-coach interactions evolve during the athlete’s sport career.”
- Meta-Perceptions of the Coach–Athlete Relationship, Achievement Goals, and Intrinsic Motivation Among Sport Participants (2010, background): “One interpersonal relationship held to be fundamental in organized sport is the coach–athlete dyad (e.g., Jowett, 2007; Wylleman, 2000).”
- Olympic medallists’ perspective of the althlete–coach relationship (2003, background): “sport performers, the existing knowledge and understanding of interpersonal relationships in sport and other areas of physical activity have remained constrained at both the theoretical and empirical level (Coppel, 1995; Wylleman, 2000; Wylleman, Carpenter, Weiss, & Ewing, 1999).”
- Social Motivation in Youth Sport (2003, background): “Further, social interactions with parents, coaches, and peers have all been associated with the quality of young people’s sport experience (e.g., Brustad, 1993; Duncan, 1993; Wylleman, 2000).”
- Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors (2011, methodology): “…coaches’ and athletes’ reciprocal respect, trust, and communication have been found to be important interpersonal factors that contribute to healthy and successful relationships (e.g., Gillet, Vallerand, Amoura, & Baldes, 2009; Jowett & Cockerill, 2003; Poczwardowski et al., 2003; Wylleman, 2000).”
- Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads (2012, methodology): “Nevertheless, our understanding of the coach–athlete relationship has been hindered by a lack of a comprehensive framework (Wylleman, 2000), and in this paper we provide at least part of such a framework by examining coach–athlete relationships within the context of Interdependence Theory.”