Passion for coaching and the quality of the coach–athlete relationship: The mediating role of coaching behaviors

By Marc-André K. Lafrenière, S. Jowett, Robert J. Vallerand, Noémie Carbonneau. 2011

217 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fd94ebafdaaf2af39b031c993f44992c642fe27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Autonomy-Supportive Pedagogical Approach to Sports Coaching: Research, Challenges and Opportunities (2014, background): “, lack of perception of choice in training) on athletes is illustrated in a number of studies [15-18].”
A systematic review of social support in youth sport (2014, background): “…Cramer (2010); 28 = Jowett and Timson-Katchis (2005); 29 = Kavussanu et al. (2011); 30 = Keegan et al. (2010); 31 = Keresztes et al. (2008); 32 = Lafrenière et al. (2011); 33 = Lauer et al. (2010); 34 = Le Bars et al. (2009); 35 = Le Bars et al. (2009); 36 = Lorimer and Jowett (2009); 37 =…”
When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport (2013, background): “In the past decade, numerous researches have highlighted the crucial role of the quality of the coacheathlete relationship for athletes’ optimal functioning (e.g. Jowett, 2005; Lafrenière et al., 2011; Lyle, 2002).”
Refining and regaining skills in fixation/diversification stage performers: the Five-A Model (2011, background): “In this sense, the sport psychologist and coach must convince the athlete to have confidence in the change programme and their ability to implement it successfully, reflecting the importance of and need for a harmonious coach–athlete relationship (Lafreniere, Jowett, Vallerand, & Carbonneau, 2011 )”
The relationship between coach leadership, the coach–athlete relationship, team success, and the positive developmental experiences of adolescent soccer players (2013, methodology): “However, the CART-Q is used as an overall measure of the perceived quality of the coach–athlete relationship and subscales are disregarded, as suggested by Lafreniere et al. (2011).”