Meta-Perceptions of the Coach–Athlete Relationship, Achievement Goals, and Intrinsic Motivation Among Sport Participants

140 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Extending the 3 × 2 achievement goal model to the sport domain: The 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire for Sport (2015, result): “…2005;Wang et al., 2007), has been found to be positively related to performance-approach goals in some studies (Li et al. 2011; Wang, Koh, & Chatzisarantis, 2009) but not others (Adie & Jowett, 2010; Hulleman et al., 2008), and has evidenced no clear pattern of relations with avoidance-based goals.”
Associations between the perceived quality of the coach–athlete relationship and athlete burnout: An examination of the mediating role of achievement goals (2016, background): “For example, a study with track and field athletes (Adie & Jowett, 2010) revealed that a higher quality coacheathlete relationship was positively linked to mastery-approach goals and negatively to performance-avoidance goals.”
Relational coaching in sport: Its psychological underpinnings and practical effectiveness (2016, methodology): “Applying Andrew Elliot’s (1999) hierarchical model of approach and avoidance motivation, Adie and Jowett’s (2010) findings highlighted that when athletes’ perceive their coaches to be affectively connected, think that”