Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers

By Arnold B. Bakker, M. Bal. 2010

1,236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1fbbba52ed2136cd1693067114c2d7fa146c522

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The consequences of job crafting: a three-wave study (2016, background): “…work engagement is related to employee health (e.g., Airila et al., 2014) as well as to relevant organizational outcomes, such as job performance (Bakker & Bal, 2010), customer loyalty (Salanova, Agut, & Peiró, 2005), innovativeness (Hakanen, Perhoniemi, & Toppinen-Tanner, 2008), productivity…”
Self-Efficacy, Work Engagement, and Job Satisfaction Among Teaching Assistants in Hong Kong’s Inclusive Education (2020, background): “Engaged teachers are more likely to perform better in their jobs (Bakker & Bal, 2010), be more committed to their schools (Hakanen et al., 2006; Jackson et al., 2006), and be more likely to report higher levels of job satisfaction primarily characterized by positive experiences.”
The nature of employee engagement: rethinking the employee–organization relationship (2017, background): “…that engagement is associated with higher levels of performance at both the individual and the organizational level (see Albrecht, 2010a; Bakker & Bal, 2010; Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010; Halbesleben & Wheeler, 2008; Rich et al., 2010; Salanova, Agut, & Peiró, 2005; Xanthopoulou, Baker,…”
Management of innovation: role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context (2012, background): “On the basis of theories about the motivational potential of job resources, Bakker and Bal ( 2010 ) found from a sample of 54 Dutch teachers that teachers' weekly job resources are positively related to their weekly work engagement level, and that weekly work engagement level is predictive of weekly”
Measuring Teacher Engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale (ETS) (2013, methodology): “For example, although the UWES has been used with teachers (e.g., Bakker & Bal, 2010; Hakanen, Bakker, & Schaufeli, 2006), the scale content ignores the particular conditions associated with teachers‘ work.”
Work-related flow and energy at work and at home: A study on the role of daily recovery (2012, background): “Although recent research has found that positive work experiences have a positive impact on job performance (Bakker & Bal, 2010; Demerouti, 2006; Demerouti & Cropanzano, 2010), relatively little research has investigated how positive experiences at work influence non‐work functioning.”
Weekly job crafting and leisure crafting: Implications for meaning‐making and work engagement (2017, background): “Existing literature suggests that employee job crafting andwork engagement fluctuate weekly since the factors that determine them also vary fromweek to week (Bakker & Bal, 2010; Petrou & Demerouti, 2015).”
Daily within-person effects of job autonomy and work engagement on innovative behaviour: The cross-level moderating role of creative self-efficacy (2017, background): “…research has established that on days and in weeks employees experience more profound engagement in their work roles they perform more efficiently (Bakker & Bal, 2010; Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2009), it remains to be demonstrated whether momentary work engagement specifically…”
Do Teacher Status, Gender, and Years of Teaching Experience Impact Job Satisfaction and Work Engagement? (2020, background): “Bakker and Bal (2010) concluded that teachers’ weekly engagement was positively related to their weekly job performance.”
From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: A multisample study (2015, background): “High engagement entails energy and investment in the job, persistence, and a higher focus on tasks, through which engagement will positively relate to performance (Bakker & Bal, 2010).”
Highly engaged but burned out: intra-individual profiles in the US workforce (2018, background): “Many new questions arise from the present study: What are the short- and long-term consequences of experiencing high levels of engagement and burnout together? Do engaged-exhausted workers feel the beneficial and aversive aspects of motivation and strain in the same situations, or one after another ”
Work engagement, job design and the role of the social context at work: Exploring antecedents from a relational perspective (2013, background): “Within the work engagement literature, Bakker and Bal (2010) reported no link between social support and work engagement in a sample of mostly female teachers (> 90%).”
Weekly work engagement and flourishing: The role of hindrance and challenge job demands (2013, methodology): “Work engagement was measured with a state version (Bakker & Bal, 2010) of the nine-item UWES (Schaufeli et al., 2006).”