The Virtues of Positive Psychology: the Rapprochement and Challenges of an Affirmative Postmodern Perspective

By Steven J. Sandage, Peter C. Hill. 2001

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b1c4e713fe16978fda33c6488f03f7717e33dfcd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Philosophy

Citations in the corpus

An Emancipatory Communitarian Approach to Vocational Development Theory, Research, and Practice (2005, unknown): “…and discussed in literature addressing a wide range of philosophical, theoretical, and methodological topics in psychology (Bhana & Kanjee, 2001; Lau, 2002; Matton, 2000; Paproski & Haverkamp, 2000; Ristock, 2003; Rodis, 2000; Sandage & Hill, 2001; Schumaker, 2001; Sollod, 1998; Stevenson, 2002).”
Introduction: Contributions to the Discipline of Positive Organizational Scholarship (2004, background): “Virtuousness has been rejected as saccharine, anti-intellectual, or morally dogmatic (Sandage & Hill, 2001).”
The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior (2002, background): “Specifically, POB as defined here, includes state-like concepts rather than the dispositional, trait-like taxonomy of character or virtues called for in positive psychology (e.g., see Sandage & Hill, 2001; Seligman, 1999).”
Toward a courageous mindset: The subjective act and experience of courage (2007, background): “When confronted with fear, and while assessing potential behavior responses and probable outcomes, those actors holding strong prosocial values and beliefs (part of a courageous mindset) will be more likely to act with self-concordance as their core virtues provide moral strength and resiliency in m”
The structure of virtue: An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the virtues in action inventory of strengths (2010, background): “…virtuerelated concepts historically have been of considerable interest to psychological researchers and practitioners, as exemplified in the humanistic psychology tradition (Peterson & Seligman, 2004) and in family social science research on family strengths and resilience (Sandage & Hill, 2001).”
Exploring the Relationships between Organizational Virtuousness and Performance (2004, methodology): “These virtues were selected from previous instruments and from reviews of the literature on universal virtues (e.g., Kidder, 1997; Peterson & Seligman, 2003; Sandage & Hill, 2001).”
Organizational Virtue Orientation and Family Firms (2011, unknown): “Cameron and colleagues (2004) used a list of universal individual virtues from previous instruments and literature reviews (e.g., Peterson & Seligman, 2003; Sandage & Hill, 2001) to create an instrument for assessing organizational level virtue.”
The Psychology of Encouragement (2015, methodology): “Given the intrinsic connection between virtues and well-being (Sandage & Hill, 2001), researchers can investigate whether the practice of encouragement produces positive outcomes for the encourager (and not just the recipient of encouragement).”
Organizational and Leadership Virtues and the Role of Forgiveness (2002, background): “Virtue embraces that which is good, transcendent, and honorable, or that which is most human (Peterson & Seligman, 2000; Sandage & Hill, 2001).”
Toward a Multicultural Positive Psychology: (2003, background): “Sandage and Hill (2001) affirmed the general goal of developing scientific research on constructs that represent positive psychology.”
Relationship Quality and Virtuousness (2013, background): “Resilience is often described as an outcome of virtuousness (e.g., Cameron et al., 2004; Sandage & Hill, 2001).”