The State of U.S. Corporate Governance: What's Right and What's Wrong?

By Ann C. Logue. 2004

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Corporate Governance, Corporate Ownership, and the Role of Institutional Investors: A Global Perspective (2003, unknown): “2For recent reviews of other governance issues, see Brunt, Bolton, and Roell (2003), Denis (2001), Denis and McConnell (2003), and Holmstrom and Kaplan (2001, 2003). we mean by the term, corporate governance.”
Are U.S. CEOs Paid More Than U.K. CEOs? Inferences from Risk-adjusted Pay (2011, background): “Instead it is necessary to compare US practices with those of other countries where compensation practices ex ante are expected to suffer from these problems to a lesser extent [e.g., Core, Guay, and Thomas (2005) and Holmstrom and Kaplan (2003)].”
The Complementarity between Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility (2005, unknown): “48 Holmstrom and Kaplan (2003).”
Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation (2008, unknown): “A contrasting viewpoint, however, is that benchmarking represents an efficient way to determine the reservation wage of the CEO (e.g., Holmstrom and Kaplan, 2003) and is a necessary input to the compensation process.”
The Power of the Pen and Executive Compensation (2008, result): “This latter finding is consistent with Holmstrom and Kaplan’s (2003) concern that one of the reasons the press portrays executive pay as a “runaway train” is that it misinterprets the payoff from exercised options as being a component of annual pay.”