The Role of Students' Cognitive Engagement in Online Learning

By Jennifer C. Richardson, Timothy J. Newby. 2006

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af341d1fce9fd428f9875a56845859f4ff848b6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Sevda Kucuk
2. Heoncheol Yun
3. Sanghoon Park
4. Jennifer C. Richardson

In Education

1. Heoncheol Yun
2. Sanghoon Park
3. Sevda Kucuk
4. Jennifer C. Richardson
5. Robert Rueda
6. Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun
7. D. Randy Garrison

In Social Psychology

1. Sevda Kucuk
2. Heoncheol Yun
3. Sanghoon Park
4. Jennifer C. Richardson
5. Robert Rueda
6. Jerry Chih-Yuan Sun
7. D. Randy Garrison

Citations in the corpus

• Situational interest, computer self-efficacy and self-regulation: Their impact on student engagement in distance education (2012, background): “In academic settings, engagement refers to the quality of effort students make to perform well and achieve desired outcomes (Hu & Kuh, 2002; Richardson, Long & Foster, 2004; Richardson & Newby, 2006).”
• The Influence of Motivational Regulation Strategies on Online Students’ Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive Engagement (2018, background): “Engagement refers to the quality of students’ efforts to achieve designed outcomes (Richardson & Newby, 2006).”
• A structural equation model of predictors of online learners’ engagement and satisfaction (2019, background): “…learners’ engagement and satisfaction based on the CoI framework can help guide practitioners in selecting appropriate strategies to promote the active engagement of learners and overall student satisfaction (Ma, Han, Yang, & Cheng, 2015; Richardson & Newby, 2006; Robinson & Hullinger, 2008).”