The meaning and measurement of work ethic: Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional inventory.

By Michael J. Miller, D. Woehr, N. Hudspeth. 2002

474 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aee3a9a6c37ce144e977fcf4ae56de83e7ca06d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. John P. Meriac
2. Christina Banister
3. Fani Lauermann
4. D. Woehr
5. Stuart A. Karabenick

In Information Systems and Management

1. John P. Meriac
2. Christina Banister
3. Fani Lauermann
4. D. Woehr
5. Stuart A. Karabenick

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. John P. Meriac
2. Christina Banister
3. Fani Lauermann
4. D. Woehr
5. Stuart A. Karabenick
6. B. Steijn

Citations in the corpus

• Generational Differences in Work Ethic: An Examination of Measurement Equivalence Across Three Cohorts (2010, methodology): “Work ethic may be defined as a set of beliefs and attitudes reflecting the fundamental value of work (Miller et al. 2002).”
• Taking Teacher Responsibility Into Account(ability): Explicating Its Multiple Components and Theoretical Status (2011, background): “, preference for a larger distant reward rather than a smaller immediate reward), and (g) productive use of time (Miller et al., 2002).”