Self-relevant emotions.
By June P Tangney. 2003
138 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae8d85e0abb9af828288b3b21327c054ae636989
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Beyond Rational Choice: the Hot/Cool Perspective of Criminal Decision Making (2013, background): “Instead are self-conscious and directly involve (self-)reflection and evaluation (Tangney, 2003).”
- Explanations of interindividual – intergroup discontinuity: A review of the evidence (2007, background): “Furthermore, guilt motivates moral behaviour and can be regarded as the quintessential moral emotion (Tangney, 2003).”
- New Directions in Identity Control Theory (2005, background): “…emotions) focus on not meeting up to the expectations of others, with the entire person evaluated negatively, feelings of guilt (and its close relatives) address having done a bad thing, thus the person’s behavior, rather than their entire self, is evaluated negatively (Lewis, 2000; Tangney, 2003).”
- Between Person and Person: Dialogical Pedagogy in Authentic Leadership Development (2014, background): “Tangney (2003) argued that empathy also acts as a self-regulatory m al emotion.”
- Self-compassion and adaptive psychological functioning. (2007, background): “Such situations can also invoke feelings of shame, which stem from negative global self-evaluations and the perceived threat of social isolation (Lewis, 1971; Nathanson, 1987; Tangney, 2003).”
- Gender Differences in Work-Family Guilt in Parents of Young Children (2017, background): “Guilt is a self-evaluative emotion that arises when people feel they have violated a societal or moral standard and deserve reproach for their wrongdoing (Jones and Kugler 1993; Klass 1987; Tangney 2003).”
- The effects of authentic leadership on followers' ethical decision-making in the face of temptation: An experimental study (2014, background): “This is critical as guilt acts as a self-regulatory mechanism to diminish unethical behavior (Tangney, 2003).”
- Moral courage in the workplace: moving to and from the desire and decision to act (2007, background): “From a young age, people are socialized to different degrees to feel such selfconscious emotions as empathy, pride, guilt, shame, embarrassment, envy and jealousy (Tangney & Fischer 1995, Lewis 2000, Tangney 2003).”
- The effect of authentic transformational leadership on follower and group ethics (2011, methodology): “Beyond our focus on leadership, using theories of moral identity (Aquino & Reed, 2002; Blasi, 1984), self-concept-based motivation (Leonard, Beauvais, & Scholl, 1999; Shamir, House, & Arthur, 1993), authentic leadership development (Gardner, Avolio, Luthans, May, & Walumbwa, 2005), and moral emotion”
- Moral leadership: Explicating the moral component of authentic leadership (2005, background): “More specific to moral leadership, Camacho, Higgins, and Luger (2003) applied the concept of regulatory focus (Higgins, 1997) to moral evaluations, discovering that when a person perceived a fit violation, they experienced cognitive disequilibrium and expressed more guilt (Tangney, 2003).”
- Reactions to Discrimination, Stigmatization, Ostracism, and Other Forms of Interpersonal Rejection (2009, unknown): “This shame response stands in contrast to people’s reactions when they feel guilty, in which people recognize that they have performed a bad behavior but do not strongly denigrate themselves and are motivated to repair the damage rather than to withdraw (Tangney, 2003).”
- Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi-faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges A Report by the American Psychological Association's Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change Members (2009, background): “…guilt versus shame with the former resulting from reflections on one’s behavior and the latter resulting from reflections on personal characteristics (Tangney, 2003; Lickel, Schmader, Curtis, Scarnier, & Ames, 2005), distinctions between people feeling guilty for their own behavior versus…”