A conceptual framework for the analysis of vulnerability in supply chains

By Göran Svensson. 2000

514 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae79abc76ae83c369c4f5543b61ee0a4fb13dc10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks (2018, background): “Qualitative supply chain resilience strategies have focused on sources of risk and on drivers of supply chain vulnerability along with their dependencies and relationships (Svensson 2000; Christopher 2003; Sheffi et al. 2003; Chopra and Sodhi 2004; Christopher and Peck 2004; Kleindorfer and Saad 200”
A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling ☆ (2015, unknown): “Assessment Quantitative; Qualitative [140]”
A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory (2008, background): “In addition, the relatively few existing studies appearing in the logistics literature that have rigorously employed inductive approaches have relied on grounded theory techniques or similar interpretive tradition (Flint et al., 2005; Svensson, 2000).”
An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability (2006, background): “For instance, Svensson (2000) names two classes (quantitative and qualitative), Ju¨ttner (2005) proposes three classes (supply, demand, and environmental), and Chopra and Sodhi (2004) delineate nine of them (disruptions, delays, systems, forecast, intellectual property, procurement , receivables,…”
The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities (2007, background): “Supply chain disruptions are unplanned and unanticipated events that disrupt the normal flow of goods and materials within a supply chain (Svensson, 2000; Hendricks & Singhal, 2003; Kleindorfer & Saad, 2005) and, as a consequence, expose firms within the supply chain to operational and financial ris”
Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective (2015, background): “…events that disrupt the normal flow of goods and materials within a supply chain (adapted from Kleindorfer and Saad, 2005, Stauffer, 2003, and Svensson, 2000) • Disruption as the number of nodes in a supply network whose ability to ship and/or receive goods and materials (i.e., both…”
Single or dual sourcing: decision-making in the presence of supply chain disruption risks (2009, background): “Both Svensson [9] and Hallikas and Vivolainen [10] have found that a small customer structure change and a short lead time could result in supply chain risk and disruption, and furthermore, the relationship between the buyer and the supplier affects those risks and disruptions.”
Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (2013, background): “Svensson (2000) defined supply chain disruptions as unplanned events that may occur in the supply chain, which might affect the normal or expected flow of materials and components.”
Supply Chain Risk Management: Present and Future Scope (2012, unknown): “Svensson (2000, 2002) conceptualizes the inbound and outbound vulnerability in supply chain based on sources and categories of disturbances.”