Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks

By Jafar Namdar, Xueping Li, Rupy Sawhney, Ninad Pradhan. International Journal of Production Research, 2018

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Low-Certainty-Need (LCN) supply chains: a new perspective in managing disruption risks and resilience (2018, unknown): “…in a decision maker, ranging from risk neutral to risk averse (Ho et al. 2015, Rangel et al. 2015, Yang and Babich 2015, Snyder et al. 2016, Ivanov et al. 2017c, Kumar et al. 2017, Sawik 2017, Reyes Levalle and Nof 2017, Yoon et al. 2018a, Carbonara and Pellegrino 2018, Namdar et al. 2018).”
Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience (2019, unknown): “2018), that may cause unexpected disruption (Namdar et al. 2018).”
Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda (2021, background): “The beneficial portion of the CBA can be modelled via the reduction of the disruption risk by a given percentage or its incurring costs, the shortening of the period of the disruption impact or via sustaining the service level (Namdar et al. 2018).”
Resilient and sustainable supply chain design: sustainability analysis under disruption risks (2018, background): “…2013; Sadghiani, Torabi, and Sahebjamnia 2015; Zhang et al. 2015; Kamalahmadi and Mellat-Parast 2016; Nooraie and Parast 2016; Torabi et al. 2016; Namdar et al. 2017; Sawik 2017); • contracting with backup suppliers/facilities to serve when the primary suppliers/facilities are not available in…”