A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory

By Craig R. Carter, Dale S. Rogers. 2008

4,013 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Marketing, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c7f1a16a3e8f6ed10d704eb2ce7428c174d3cfe2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. Angappa Gunasekaran
2. Dmitry A. Ivanov
3. Rameshwar Dubey
4. Thanos Papadopoulos
5. Stephen J. Childe
6. Constantin Blome
7. Samuel Fosso Wamba
8. Tobias Schoenherr

In Marketing

1. Sebastian Kot
2. Stefan Seuring
3. Kannan Govindan
4. Dmitry A. Ivanov
5. Helen Walker
6. Joseph Sarkis
7. Stephen Brammer
8. Fahian Anisul Huq

In Strategy and Management

1. Dmitry A. Ivanov
2. Angappa Gunasekaran
3. Rameshwar Dubey
4. Joseph Sarkis
5. Stefan Seuring
6. Thanos Papadopoulos
7. Mark Stevenson
8. Kannan Govindan

Citations in the corpus

• Sustainable supply management: An empirical study (2012, background): “Carter and Rogers (2008) define Sustainable Supply Chain Management (SSCM) as ‘‘the strategic, transparent integration and achievement of an organization’s social, environmental and economic goals in the systemic coordination of key inter-organizational business processes for improving the…”
• A supply chain sustainability innovation framework and evaluation methodology (2018, background): “Sustainability has been defined into three broad categories, environmental, economic, and social dimensions (Carter and Rogers 2008).”
• The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices (2010, background): “One lens through which to operationalize this concept for operations and supply chain management research is the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) (Elkington, 1997; Carter and Rogers, 2008), encompassing environmental and social performance, in addition to financial performance.”
• The impact of relational governance on performance improvement in export manufacturing firms (2018, background): “Supply chain researchers have pointed out the importance to achieve sustainability performance (Carter & Rogers, 2008; Klassen & Vereecke, 2012; Pagell & Wu, 2009; Sancha, Gimenez & Sierra, 2016).”
• Social Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Textile and Apparel Industry—A Literature Review (2017, background): “Many years later, as the sustainability debate began to emerge, Carter and Rogers [9] concisely discussed sustainable supply chain management by building on the TBL concept and its integration of the three dimensions (environmental, social, and economic) into the supply chain.”
• An Institutional Theory perspective on sustainable practices across the dairy supply chain (2014, background): “…integration and achievement of an organization0s environmental, social and economic goals in the systematic coordination of key inter-organizational business processes for improving the long-term economic performance of the individual company and its chains” (Carter and Rogers, 2008, p. 365).”
• Research opportunities in purchasing and supply management (2012, methodology): “An initial theoretically derived framework was provided by Carter and Rogers (2008) (cf. also Carter and Jennings 2004).”
• Managing Imbalanced Supply Chain Relationships for Sustainability: A Power Perspective (2014, methodology): “Fourth, we specifically address the concerns about the need to increase the application of RDT to study buyer–supplier relationships (Casciaro & Piskorski, 2005), and specifically in SSCM (Carter & Easton, 2011; Carter & Rogers, 2008).”