An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability

By Stephan M. Wagner, Christoph Bode. 2006

786 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2b072b675c4214afbcd6d8143ff519dd82541372

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience (2019, background): “Previous studies have focused on supply chain disruptions (Wagner and Bode, 2006; Ivanov et al. 2017), causes of the supply chain disruptions (Craighead et al.”
Supply chain resilience for single and multiple sourcing in the presence of disruption risks (2018, background): “…along with their dependencies and relationships (Svensson 2000; Christopher 2003; Sheffi et al. 2003; Chopra and Sodhi 2004; Christopher and Peck 2004; Kleindorfer and Saad 2005; Sheffi and Rice 2005; Tang 2006a; Wagner and Bode 2006; Craighead et al. 2007; Neiger, Rotaru, and Churilov 2009).”
A critical review on supply chain risk – Definition, measure and modeling ☆ (2015, background): “Wagner and Bode state that a disruption is characterized by its probability, severity and effects [151].”
The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks (2010, background): “Once the potential network has been elaborated, the SCN is reengineered by selecting a feasible sub-network that optimizes some predetermined value criterion. a) SCN of a Pulp & Paper Company b) Potential SCN under Uncertainty CIRRELT-2008-36 2 The main type of strategic questions answered using…”
Structural drivers of upstream supply chain complexity and the frequency of supply chain disruptions (2015, background): “In comparison to sourcing from local or domestic markets, global sourcing is typically associated with increased uncertainty and less transparency due to, for example, trade restrictions, customs barriers, exchange rate fluctuations, and institutional differences (Wagner and Bode, 2006).”
A review of supply chain risk management: definition, theory, and research agenda (2018, background): “Impact drivers are conditions with risk-consequence implications (Sinha et al., 2004; Wagner and Bode, 2006) that affect the magnitude of loss (e.g. standardised Page 8 of 36International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21…”
Supply Chain Risk Management: Present and Future Scope (2012, neutral): “Environmental Risks: Environmental risks are defined as events driven by external forces such as weather, earthquakes, political, regulatory and market forces (Wagner and Bode, 2006).”