Managing Intellectual Capital

By Andrew Brown, T. Osborn, James M. Chan, Venkat Jaganathan. 2005

260 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ad6b887ef6c5493b2aa10b6c0498a250129846e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge transfer capacity and its implications for the theory of the multinational corporation (2003, background): “Teece (2000, 96) argued that: Despite recent efforts to strengthen the protection of intellectual property, strong appropriability is the exception rather than the ruley.”
Returns to alliance portfolio diversity : The relative effects of partner diversity on firm’s innovative performance and productivity (2014, unknown): “The expansion in number of different partner types, on the other hand, may increase the risk of opportunistic behavior (Combs & Ketchen, 1999; Teece, 2002).”
Managing Strategic Nets (2003, background): “Firms try to overcome this by seeking knowledge transfer and, more ambitiously, the joint creation of new knowledge and innovations through vertical and horizontal networking (Håkansson and Snehota, 1995; Kogut and Zander, 1997; Powell et al., 1996; Teece et al., 1997; Teece, 2000).”
Visualizing the structure and bridges of the intellectual property management and strategy literature: a document co-citation analysis (2014, unknown): “The strategic management of IP is also an important counterforce to the growing ease of imitation and a tool to prevent the infringement of others’ IP rights during new product development processes (Teece 2000; Cesaroni and Piccaluga 2013).”
The Theory of the Knowledge-Creating Firm: Subjectivity, Objectivity and Synthesis (2005, background): “The essence of knowledge assets is that they must be built and used internally in order for full value to be realized, and hence cannot be readily bought and sold (Teece, 2000).”
Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate (2005, background): “In the knowledge-based view of the firm (Grant 1991, 1996; Spender 1996; Teece 2000), knowledge is the foundation of a firm’s competitive advantage and, ultimately, the primary driver of a firm’s value.”
Can Ideas be Capital? Factors of Production in the Postindustrial Economy: A Review and Critique (2007, background): “It is also indicative of a general underlying conceptualization of knowledge and ideas as similar in character and behaviour to other forms of capital (Bradley, 1997; Stewart, 1997; Edvinsson & Malone, 1997; Ulrich, 1998; Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998; Granstrand, 1999; Dzinkowski, 2000; Teece, 2000).”
Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-Based Theory (2011, background): “In contrast, value shops include consulting firms that tailor services to a specific customer demand (Roos, 2002).”
Modeling a Paradigm Shift: From Producer Innovation to User and Open Collaborative Innovation (2010, unknown): “Also included are the costs of protecting the design from theft, for example, by restricting access, and enforcing noncompete agreements (Teece 2000, Marx et al. 2009).”
My Precious. The Role of Appropriability Strategies in Shaping Innovative Performance (2005, background): “Moreover, managerial strategies for appropriability have been found to be an important source of performance heterogeneity (Teece, 2002).”
Inter‐relationships between innovation and market orientation in SMEs (2007, background): “ Innovation Innovation has a positive impact on the economy (Teece, 2002) and a key element within the entrepreneurial process (Schaper and Colery, 2003).”
Assessment of Intellectual Capital Management in Taiwanese IC Design Companies: Using DEA and the Malmquist Productivity Index (2006, unknown): “Intellectual property and research and development (R&D) teams are at the core of IC design companies, which has made intellectual capital especially crucial to IC design companies (Brown et al., 2005).”