Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-Based Theory

By J. Molloy, Clint Chadwick, Robert E. Ployhart, Simon J. Golden. 2011

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/677a1ba0d0efa311293eb1699315e1153477edcf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Finance

1. Albena Pergelova
2. Fernando Angulo-Ruiz

In Strategy and Management

1. Nathan P. Podsakoff
2. Philip M. Podsakoff
3. Scott B. MacKenzie
4. Albena Pergelova
5. Fernando Angulo-Ruiz
6. Lobel Trong Thuy Tran
7. Cheng-Min Chao
8. Marko Sarstedt

Citations in the corpus

• Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences (2016, background): “First, it attempts to mitigate the ongoing problem in the organizational literature of poor conceptual clarity (Locke, 2012; Molloy et al., 2011; Suddaby, 2010).”
• Microfoundations of Routines and Capabilities: Individuals, Processes, and Structure (2012, unknown): “…with them to an organization, such as characteristics (e.g. gender, IQ); values, preferences and beliefs (e.g., risk preferences, self-efficacy); and knowledge and experience (e.g., education level, job tenure) (Felin and Hesterly, 2007; Madsen et al., 2003; Molloy et al., 2011; Zenger, 1992).”
• The impact of government financial support on the performance of new firms: the role of competitive advantage as an intermediate outcome (2014, background): “Molloy et al. (2011) made a call for construct clarity and embedding the concept of intangibles within resourcebased theory.”