Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: future research directions
By Z. Dörnyei, E. Ushioda. 2009
102 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acf51e21ef9d2de0d1092049d970cbc1e0a5fed5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ali H. Al-Hoorie
- Z. Dörnyei
- P. Macintyre
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Alastair Henry
- Mostafa Papi
- Letty Chan
- Y. Teimouri
Citations in the corpus
- The L2 motivational self system: A meta-analysis (2018, background): “In 2009, the first anthology testing this model appeared (Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2009b) reporting a number of empirical investigations that, according to Dörnyei (2009), “found solid confirmation for the proposed self system” (p. 31).”
- The interplay of possible language teacher selves in professional development choices (2013, unknown): “Email: philiphiver@igse.ac.kr second language (L2) learning motivation (see, e.g., Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2009, 2011).”
- Motivation and Vision: An Analysis of Future L2 Self Images, Sensory Styles, and Imagery Capacity Across Two Target Languages (2013, methodology): “…on the imagery dimension of motivation, the inclusion of multiple target languages also allows for the examination of a fundamental question related to future self-guides, raised by Dörnyei and Ushioda (2009b), namely, how distinct the self-images associated with different target languages are.”
- Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive-broadening power of the imagination (2012, background): “…behind this model is that if progress in the target language is linked to one’s ideal and ought-to selves, motivation to learn the language is enhanced because of the learner’s psychological desire to reduce the discrepancy between current and possible future selves (D rnyei & Ushioda, 2009).”
- Examining the impact of L2 English on L3 selves: A case study (2011, background): “…as the L2 Motivational Self System ‘runs the risk of ending up with a rather static category system that does not take into account sufficiently the process-oriented nature of motivation or the dynamic interaction between motivation and the social environment’ (Dörnyei & Ushioda, 2009, p. 355).”