Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes

By Linda Argote, Bill McEvily, Ray E. Reagans. Management Sciences, 2003

2,199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ace95274b654c28491da73ddff4c67a8c3e53f06

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Strategic Alignment Between Business and Information Technology: A Knowledge-Based View of Behaviors, Outcome, and Consequences (2006, background): “the prior explanations for why knowledge integration is difficult [3, 63].”
Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used (2008, background): “[7] conclude a special issue of Management Science with an article that provides a framework for organizing the literature on knowledge management, identifies emerging themes, and suggests directions for further research.”
Organizational Learning (2012, background): “…favors a divergence of ideas and processes (and views about their relative importance) rather than the consistency and repeatability of knowledge that is needed for distribution, organizational memory, and knowledge institutionalization (Argote et al., 2003; Crossan et al., 1999; Huber, 1991).”
Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Innovation Capability: The Mediating Role of Absorptive Capability and Organizational Learning Capabilities (2021, background): “OL refers to the learning process of how and why we need to conduct the business? It creates new ideas and upgrades business processes [14], aiming to leverage the culture of learning and collaboration among all organizational partners, which leads to the generation of valuable knowledge from differ”
Knowledge Beyond the Individual? Making Sense of a Notion of Collective Knowledge in Organization Theory (2012, methodology): “According to this theory, a working group or organization can be understood as a TMS for encoding, storing, retrieving, applying and communicating knowledge (e.g., Argote et al., 2003; Ren et al., 2006; Wegner, 1986).”
Which Problems to Solve? Online Knowledge Sharing and Attention Allocation in Organizations (2014, background): “Scholars have made considerable efforts to understand with greater precision how the processes of knowledge sharing unfold within firms (e.g., Argote et al., 2003; Hansen, 1999; Quigley et al., 2007; Reagans & McEvily, 2003; Szulanski, 1996).”
How do organizations remember? The influence of organizational structure on organizational memory (2010, background): “Consequently, specialists show a higher degree of collaboration (Argote et al. 2003; Hage and Aiken 1967; John and Martin 1984; Menon and Varadarajan 1992).”
Trust in management and knowledge sharing: The mediating effects of fear and knowledge documentation (2008, background): “It is evident that collective knowledge (and thus knowledge sharing), both within and across work groups, plays a fundamental role in determining the effectiveness of organizations [7,37].”