Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress

By A. Homburg, Andreas Stolberg. 2006

349 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/acac2d9b1271cb0162b382261a86d9aba97e0ca7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

The mediating role of place attachment between nature connectedness and human well-being: perspectives from Japan (2019, result): “The use of self-reports is reported to be questionable with some studies doubting their validity (Homburg and Stolberg 2006), while others demonstrate their usability in providing valid research outputs (Kaiser et al.”
How do children cope with global climate change? Coping strategies, engagement, and well-being (2012, positive): “Studies with adults have shown that self-efficacy and collective efficacy (group efficacy) in relation to environmental issues seem to be two separate concepts (Homburg & Stolberg, 2006; Van Zomeren et al., 2010).”
Learned helplessness moderates the relationship between environmental concern and behavior (2018, background): “…link within this line of research is between self-efficacy (i.e., one's belief in their ability to succeed in a specific situation or task) and pro-environmental behavior (Geiger, Swim, & Fraser, 2017; Jugert et al., 2016; Lauren, Fielding, Smith, & Louis, 2016; cf. Homburg & Stolberg, 2006).”
A Comparative Study of Green Purchase Intention between Korean and Chinese Consumers: The Moderating Role of Collectivism (2017, background): “Homburg and Stolberg found that people’s engagement in pro-environmental activities cannot be predicted by self-efficacy but rather by collective efficacy [45].”
Antecedents of pro-environmental behaviours at work: The moderating influence of psychological contract breach (2014, background): “Based on the work from Homburg and Stolberg (2006), PEBs may be direct or indirect. Whereas direct PEBs refer to performing concrete gestures towards improving the environment (e.g., recycling), indirect PEBs refer to worker motivation about providing advice or encouragement to others individuals in”
Experimental evidence for a dual pathway model analysis of coping with the climate crisis (2010, background): “In line with this idea, Homburg and Stolberg (2006) showed in a series of correlational studies that group efficacy beliefs, but not self-efficacy beliefs, were associated with environmental behavior 3.”
Attitudes, efficacy beliefs, and willingness to pay for environmental protection when travelling (2015, methodology): “With regard to group membership, different levels of aggregation may be distinguished (cf. Homburg and Stolberg, 2006).”
Self-efficacy or collective efficacy within the cognitive theory of stress model: Which more effectively explains people's self-reported proenvironmental behavior? (2015, methodology): “Rival theoretical models were compared with Model 1, a baseline model that included self-efficacy as the major predictor of proenvironmental behavior that was proposed by Homburg and Stolberg (2006).”
Application of Protection Motivation Theory to Investigate Sustainable Waste Management Behaviors (2017, background): “As Homburg and Stolberg [57] found, the combination of perceived risks and self-efficacy could motivate people to engage in ecological behaviors.”
Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior (2010, background): “In addition, Homberg and Stolberg (2006) found that positive feelings about the group’s ability tomanage environmental problems (rather than one’s own ability) elicited more proenvironmental behavior than did negative feelings.”