Attitudes, efficacy beliefs, and willingness to pay for environmental protection when travelling

By Rouven Doran, Daniel Hanss, Svein Larsen. 2015

86 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Environmental sustainability may be seen as a collective challenge that can only be met if a sufficient number of individuals cooperate. Whether or not individual tourists are willing to contribute their share may thus depend not only on the degree to which they think that environmental sustainability is important (attitudes), but also on the degree to which they think that other tourists hold similar attitudes (social comparison). Other possible influences are beliefs that one's own behaviour can make a difference (self-efficacy beliefs) and that tourists as a group together can make a difference (collective efficacy beliefs). This paper reports on findings from a study (N = 358) that investigated the role of these factors in explaining people's willingness to pay for environmental protection when travelling. Attitudes, self-efficacy and collective efficacy accounted for 30% of the variance in willingness to pay for environmental protection; social comparison did not explain additional variance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/204916bbe5719d5ad048b8b62a2af99a3f8aaceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Daniel Hanss
  2. Svein Larsen
  3. Rouven Doran

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. Svein Larsen
  2. Daniel Hanss
  3. Rouven Doran
  4. Siti Munerah
  5. Kian Yeik Koay
  6. Seethaletchumy Thambiah

In Marketing

  1. Svein Larsen
  2. Daniel Hanss
  3. Rouven Doran
  4. Siti Munerah
  5. Kian Yeik Koay
  6. Seethaletchumy Thambiah
  7. Jong-Hyeong Kim
  8. J. Nawijn

Citations in the corpus