Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research

By Kun-Hung Cheng, Chin-Chung Tsai. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2012

794 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review (2021, background): “Other authors, like Akçay ı r and Akçay ı r (2017), Antonioli et al. (2014), Cheng and Tsai (2013), Dunleavy et al. (2009), van Kreveln and Poelman (2010) and Wu et al. (2013), show that AR is distracting and is providing too much information at once while working on learning tasks.”
When art meets tech: The role of augmented reality in enhancing museum experiences and purchase intentions (2018, background): “Augmenting digital assets about exhibits and augmenting immersive scenes are integral to AR display design in a variety of scenarios (Cheng & Tsai, 2013; Yuen et al., 2011).”
A review of using Augmented Reality in Education from 2011 to 2016 (2017, background): “Studies in this field focused on language learning[20], [21], [6], visual art and painting appreciation[22], [23].”
Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load (2016, background): “In AR applications, there are two basic image recognition techniques: marker-based and location-based (Cheng and Tsai, 2012).”
Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education : A systematic review of the literature (2017, background): “However, though numerous AR studies have been published, the educational advantages and related utilities of AR have only recently been explored in detail (Cheng & Tsai, 2013; Martin et al., 2011).”