What's Different in Second-Language Processing? Evidence from Event-Related Brain Potentials

By Anja Hahne. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2001

393 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab6f910f2021f82669087c6a88810e07665440fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Brain Potentials Reveal Discrete Stages of L2 Grammatical Learning (2010, background): “The LAN features prominently in some recent neurocognitive models of native language processing (Friederici, 1995; Hahne & Friederici, 1999; Ullman, 2001, 2005); analogously, the lack of LAN effects in some L2 studies has been argued to reflect a corresponding absence of the linguistic process…”
Parsing a first language like a second: The erosion of L1 parsing strategies in Spanish-English Bilinguals (2004, neutral): “…during syntactic processing and sentence parsing (some exceptions are, e.g., Fernández, 1995, 1999, 2003; Frenck-Mestre, 2002; Frenck-Mestre & Pynte, 1997; Hahne, 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Hernández, Bates, & Ávila, 1994; Hoover & Dwivedi, 1998; Juffs, 1998a and b; Juffs & Harrington, 1995).”
Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do (2013, background): “Studies aiming at unravelling the cause of this difference have identified differences in L1 and L2 lexical (Soares & Grosjean, 1984), semantic (Hahne, 2001; Weber-Fox, Davis, & Cuadrado, 2003), and syntactic (Frenck-Mestre, 2002; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Sanders & Neville, 2003; Weber-Fox &…”
The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance* (2009, background): “…differ from native processing due to a shortage of computational resources for integrating different types of grammatical information on-line (e.g. Hahne, 2001; Hopp, 2006; McDonald, 2006) rather than due to fundamentally different linguistic representations or processing mechanisms in L2 parsing…”
Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly? (2008, methodology): “Hahne (2001) and Hahne and Friederici (2001) investigated phrase-structure processing in late L2 learners of German.”
Novice Learners, Longitudinal Designs, and Event-Related Potentials: A Means for Exploring the Neurocognition of Second Language Processing. (2006, methodology): “(2) Tu adores\*adorez le francais.”
The processing of ambiguous sentences by first and second language learners of English (2003, background): “28 with respect to the ‘N400’ ERP component thought to reflect semantic integration difficulty, there were qualitative differences between the groups with respect to the presence of ERP components associated with first-pass parsing (‘Early Anterior Negativity’, Hahne, 2001) or later syntactic proces”
Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap* (2012, background): “There is strong evidence that L2 proficiency is an important factor for L2 syntactic processing (Frenck-Mestre, 2002; Hahne, 2001; Hopp, 2006; Jackson, 2008) and there is also some evidence that L2 learners’ WM capacity can influence their realtime L2 syntactic processing (Dussias & Piñar, 2010;…”
Can late L2 learners acquire new grammatical features? Evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking ☆ (2012, result): “There was no apparent delay in processing in the learner group, in contrast to data from ERP studies, which suggest that L2 syntactic processing is often delayed compared to L1 processing (Ardal, Donald, Meuter, Muldrew, & Luce, 1990; Hahne, 2001).”
Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing (2006, background): “…effects in non-native processing have been reported in an eye-tracking study by Frenck-Mestre (2002) and in event-related potential (ERP) studies (Hahne, 2001; Hahne and Friederici, 2001; Sabourin, 2003), in which more advanced learners demonstrate evidence of automatic neurophysiological…”
Age and Second Language Acquisition and Processing: A Selective Overview (2006, background): “…that is, the timing components of high-proficient L2 use are by and large similar to those of L1 use, even when acquisition of L2 was begun at age 12 or later (e.g., Hahne, 2001; Hahne & Friederici, 2001; Ojima, Nakata, & Kakigi, 2005; Proverbio , Cok, & Zani, 2002; Stowe & Sabourin, 2005).”
Grammatical processing in language learners (2006, background): “Likewise, the finding that P600 effects were seen in the L2 learners in the same conditions as for native speakers is compatible with previous ERP studies of syntactic processing in non-native speakers which demonstrated P600 effects for phrase-structure violations (Hahne, 2001; Weber-Fox & Neville,”
An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? (2014, background): “The latter window is somewhat longer than is typical in P600 studies in monolinguals, because the P600 in L2 learners can be somewhat delayed (Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996; Hahne, 2001; Rossi et al., 2006; Sabourin and Stowe, 2008).”
Electrophysiological correlates of second language processing (2005, neutral): “On the one hand, some striking similarities to native speakers were discovered, notably the P600 (Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996; Hahne 2001; Hahne et al., 2003; Sabourin, 2003), which suggests that more controlled syntactic parsing processes can at least in principle be acquired in a number of…”
Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels (2010, background): “For example, Hahne (2001) observed a delayed P600 in L2 (we elaborate on this at a later point in this article).”