Second language processing: when are first and second languages processed similarly?
By Laura Sabourin, Laurie A. Stowe. 2008
229 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9ea2e25b8c23bb2874c859c25a59495460cb7a96
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Holger Hopp
- Monika S. Schmid
- Moniek Bresser
- Simone A. Sprenger
- Nienke Meulman
- Laurie A. Stowe
- Paola E. Dussias
- Robert Fiorentino
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Holger Hopp
- Monika S. Schmid
- Moniek Bresser
- Simone A. Sprenger
- Nienke Meulman
- Laurie A. Stowe
- Paola E. Dussias
- Rosa E. Guzzardo Tamargo
Citations in the corpus
- Learning (not) to predict: Grammatical gender processing in second language acquisition (2016, background): “…(ERP) studies reveal that sensitivity to agreement violations correlates with the realization of grammatical gender marking in the L1 (e.g. Sabourin and Stowe, 2008; though see Foucart and Frenck-Mestre, 2011; Gillon-Dowens et al., 2010, 2011), proficiency (Gabriele et al., 2013; Sagarra…”
- Morphosyntactic processing in advanced second language (L2) learners: An event-related potential investigation of the effects of L1–L2 similarity and structural distance (2014, background): “whether a given L2 feature is present in the L1; whether a feature shared by the L1 and the L2 is realized similarly at the morphological level) impact processing (e.g. Bond et al., 2011; Foucart and Frenck-Mestre, 2011; Gillon-Dowens et al., 2010, 2011; Osterhout et al., 2006; Sabourin and Stowe, 2”
- Grammatical gender in adult L2 acquisition: Relations between lexical and syntactic variability (2013, background): “These effects are found for L2ers across L1s, although learners whose L1s also mark grammatical gender show target-like ERP signatures sooner (Sabourin and Stowe, 2008).”
- An ERP study on L2 syntax processing: When do learners fail? (2014, methodology): “The latter window is somewhat longer than is typical in P600 studies in monolinguals, because the P600 in L2 learners can be somewhat delayed (Weber-Fox and Neville, 1996; Hahne, 2001; Rossi et al., 2006; Sabourin and Stowe, 2008).”
- WHEN GENDER AND LOOKING GO HAND IN HAND (2013, background): “Sabourin and Stowe ( 2008 ) showed that when there is not suffi cient congruence between the L1 and the L2 systems, transfer of information from one system to the other can fail.”