Why Minimally Guided Teaching Techniques Do Not Work: A Reply to Commentaries

By John Sweller, Paul A. Kirschner, Richard E. Clark. 2007

408 citations recorded by the source corpus.

In this reply to commentaries on the Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006) paper, we not only reemphasize the importance of randomized, controlled experimental tests of competing instructional procedures, but also indicate that altering one variable at a time is an essential feature of a properly controlled experiment. Furthermore, we also emphasize that variable must be relevant to the issue at hand with its effects explainable by our knowledge of human cognitive architecture. We reject the view that the presentation of relevant information should be reduced in favor of teaching learners how to find information. Lastly, we indicate that we believe a new educational psychology has been developed that has the potential to rapidly change our field.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ab52c79720ebabef2357cc024115a187e11be881

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. John Sweller
  2. Richard E. Mayer
  3. Fred Paas
  4. Femke C. Kirschner
  5. Alexander Renkl
  6. Patricia A. Alexander
  7. Paul A. Kirschner
  8. Silke Schworm

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

  1. John Sweller
  2. Fred Paas
  3. Richard E. Mayer
  4. Paul A. Kirschner
  5. Alexander Renkl
  6. Femke C. Kirschner
  7. Patricia A. Alexander
  8. J. V. van Merriënboer

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. John Sweller
  2. Fred Paas
  3. Paul A. Kirschner
  4. Richard E. Mayer
  5. Alexander Renkl
  6. Femke C. Kirschner
  7. J. V. van Merriënboer
  8. Patricia A. Alexander

Citations in the corpus