The Social Dynamics of Entrepreneurship

By W. Bygrave, Maria Minniti. 2000

269 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa74a49c10168cec106f340bacf138f7322fb0e6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The Scientometrics of Social Entrepreneurship and Its Establishment as an Academic Field1 (2018, background): “(See Schramm 2010, who argues that that all entrepreneurship has a social function, a point of view already mentioned by Bygrave and Minniti 2000 and others; see M€uller 2013 for an qualitative empirical study of the social and socioeconomical functions of rural entrepreneurship.”
Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain (2011, background): “Informal institutional factors, therefore, would reflect the social dynamics of entrepreneurship, where the level of entrepreneurial activity within a community is an unintended consequence of many individual choices with respect to entrepreneurship (Bygrave and Minniti 2000).”
Skill and value perceptions: how do they affect entrepreneurial intentions? (2008, background): “The environmental or institutional factors reflect the social dynamics of entrepreneurship, where the level of entrepreneurial activity within a community is an unintended consequence of many individual choices with respect to entrepreneurship (Bygrave and Minniti 2000).”
Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, background): “Bygrave and Minniti (2000) found that every entrepreneurship has a social function; however, SE differs from traditional entrepreneurship in its primary mission of creating social value rather than generating private economic gains (Bedi & Yadav, 2019; Pless, 2012; Santos, 2012; Mair et al., 2012a).”
Does the degree of redundancy in social networks influence the success of business start‐ups? (2002, background): “Economic environments with high establishment rates are conducive to entrepreneurship through the creation of new markets and activities (Bygrave and Minniti, 2000).”
Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship (2007, background): “Specifically, Bygrave and Minniti (2000) found that as concentrations of new ventures form in a geographic region, benefits accrue to other local ventures (current and future).”
Entrepreneurship and Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid: A Recipe for Inclusive Growth or Social Exclusion? (2012, background): “They, however, were willing to follow this less lucrative approach, as they were aware that it could influence future productive structures (Bygrave and Minniti, 2000) and establish a more socially constructive institutional environment (Baumol, 1990; North, 1990).”
The Origins of Entrepreneurial Opportunities (2003, unknown): “In one way, this positive feedback mechanism where entrepreneurship creates additional entrepreneurial opportunities might be viewed as a kind of network externality, as discussed by Bygrave and Minniti (2000). Bygrave and Minniti focus on the way that the culture of entrepreneurship can spread, whi”
Toward a Theory of Community-Based Enterprise (2006, unknown): “All of these conjectures are consistent with existing theory on the factors that promote entrepreneurship among individuals (Bygrave & Minniti, 2000; Minniti & Bygrave, 1999).”