Theory and Research on Small Groups

By Amy C. Edmondson, R. Tindale. 2000

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Transactive Memory Systems (2008, unknown): “Research, presented chronologically in Table 2Ellis, 2006; Lewis, 2004; Lewis, Belliveau, Herdon, & Keller, 2007; Lewis et al,, 2005; Liang, Moreland, & Argote, 1995; Moreland, Argote, & Krishnan, 1996, 1998; Moreland & Myaskovsky, 2000; Myaskovsky, Unikel, & Dew, 2005; Pearsall & Ellis, 2006; Rulke”
Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy on group performance. (2003, background): “Group size can influence transactive memory by affecting communications within the group and by changing the amount of information needed to maintain a high level of group expertise (Wittenbaum, Vaughan, & Stasser, 1998); larger groups require each group member to remember information about more peo”
An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration (2003, background): “Students collaborate to solve problems or achieve more effective learning through cooperation (e.g., Johnson & Johnson, 1998; Slavin, 1983).”
Talking about time: Effects of temporal planning and time awareness norms on group coordination and performance. (2003, background): “Although group membersmay tacitly adjust their behavior to coordinate their actions while working(Wittenbaum, Vaughan, &Stasser, 1998), explicit planningprior to task execution also has the potential to help a group coordinateeffectively.”