Humility: Review of measurement strategies and conceptualization as personality judgment
By Don E. Davis, Everett L. Worthington Jr., J. Hook. 2010
284 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/aa19d2ee0c2304e79217166de46cc5d6991125e8
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Sonja Lyubomirsky
- Jo-Ann Tsang
- Don E. Davis
- Everett L. Worthington Jr.
- J. Hook
- Miguel Pina e Cunha
- Arménio Rego
- Robert A Emmons
In Sociology and Political Science
- Bradley P. Owens
- J. Hook
- Don E. Davis
- Megan K. Johnson
- Sonja Lyubomirsky
- J. Chancellor
- Jo-Ann Tsang
- Jordan P. LaBouff
Citations in the corpus
- Humble persons are more helpful than less humble persons: Evidence from three studies (2012, methodology): “There are several possible methods to assess humility, each with relative strengths and weaknesses (Davis et al., 2010).”
- Cultural humility: measuring openness to culturally diverse clients. (2013, background): “In their review of definitions of humility, Davis, Worthington, and Hook (2010) noted that definitions of humility generally included both intrapersonal and interpersonal components.”
- Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects (2017, unknown): “The honesty-humility subscale of the HEXACO Personality Inventory (Ashton & Lee, 2008) is one of the most frequently used self-report measures of humility (Davis et al., 2010).”
- Humility and the Development and Repair of Social Bonds: Two Longitudinal Studies (2013, background): “The study of humility, however, has not followed suit (see Davis, Worthington, & Hook, 2010 , for a review).”
- Finding middle ground between intellectual arrogance and intellectual servility: Development and assessment of the limitations-owning intellectual humility scale (2018, background): “Self-report measures of all types of humility can be prone to self-inflation, but often are not equipped to distinguish between under-inflation of weaknesses by narcissists or over-inflation of weaknesses by servile individuals (Davis et al., 2010).”
- Expressed Humility in Organizations: Implications for Performance, Teams, and Leadership (2013, background): “2004, Davis et al. 2010). For instance, Richards (1992) argued that although those who actually possess humility are not likely to attribute this virtue to themselves, close others may be able to observe and report on this virtue.”
- Associations between Dispositional Humility and Social Relationship Quality (2011, background): “Part of the challenge appears to be there is not a gold-standard measure of humility (Davis et al., 2010; Tangney, 2009).”
- Humble Beginnings: Current Trends, State Perspectives, and Hallmarks of Humility (2013, methodology): “, 2006), but a lack of convincing validation studies left other researchers questioning what they were actually measuring (Davis et al., 2010; however, see also LaBouff et al., 2012).”
- Humble Chief Executive Officers’ Connections to Top Management Team Integration and Middle Managers’ Responses (2014, background): “For example, some definitions include dimensions such as frugality (Vera and Rodriguez-Lopez, 2004), sincerity, or fairness (Lee and Ashton, 2004) that seem to lack face validity (Davis, Worthington, and Hook, 2010).”
- How leader humility helps teams to be humbler, psychologically stronger, and more effective: a moderated mediation model (2017, background): “” Considering that expressed humility is an interpersonal quality, a viable alternative to self-report is reports from close observers (Davis et al., 2010; Owens et al., 2013).”
- Intellectual humility and religious tolerance (2017, background): “Fourth, self-report measures of humility have been criticized because of social desirable responding (Davis et al., 2010).”