Measuring implicit psychological constructs in organizational behavior: An example using psychological capital

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Psychological capital: A review and synthesis (2014, methodology): “Further, the I-PCQ measure has only been validated by one existing study (Harms & Luthans, 2012).”
Effects of Psychological Capital on Mental Health and Substance Abuse (2015, background): “Instead of assessing PsyCap with a face-valid self-report instrument (and the many documented shortcomings that accompany that approach), Harms and Luthans (2012) have demonstrated that implicit measures of PsyCap are easily administered, equally predictive to self-report measures, and resistant to ”
The relationship between psychological capital, job satisfaction, and safety perceptions in the maritime industry (2015, background): “According to Harms and Luthans (2012) PsyCap represents a state like disposition reflected through a ‘‘positive appraisal of circumstances and probability for success based on motivated effort and perseverance’’ (Luthans et al., 2007b, p. 550).”
Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach (2017, methodology): “Future research should be aimed at further establishing the psychometric properties of PsyCap, with a particular focus on test–retest reliability and within-subject variability implementing true longitudinal designs.”