Guest editors\' introduction to the special issue: why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity

By David G. Hoopes, Tammy L. Madsen, Gordon Walker. 2003

993 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7eb1fe5b9864719dbf998ada8284f0360d9ce5f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

What Do Resource- and Capability-Based Theories Propose? (2011, background): “As they note, the dominant established approach involves specifying abnormal profits as a first-order autoregressive process (e.g., Cubbin & Geroski, 1987; Jacobsen, 1988; Mueller, 1986; Waring, 1996).”
Sources and Consequences of Bargaining Power in Supply Chains (2007, methodology): “According to the VPC framework (Hoopes et al., 2003), the total value created by a supply chain can be thought of as the sum of the value-added by each firm, which we call pre-SCM profits, plus SCM gains.”
The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor (2006, methodology): “We find these conditions are still respected in recent literature (see Hoopes et al., 2003; King and Zeithaml, 2003; or Wiklund and Shepherd, 2003).”
Strategic resources and performance: a meta‐analysis (2008, background): “Because strategic resources generate economic value, an organization that possesses them can develop competitive advantages, and because strategic resources cannot be easily replicated, resources-based advantages can be sustained over time ( Hoopes, Madsen, and Walker, 2003 ).”
Comprehensive Board Diversity and Quality of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Evidence from an Emerging Market (2017, background): “8 The RBV theory also recognizes that the heterogeneities of resources and capabilities are valuable assets that contribute to the ﬁrm’s competitive advantage (Hoopes et al. 2003).”
Enhancing the prescriptiveness of the resource‐based view through Porterian activity analysis (2007, methodology): “Adding activity drivers to the conversation makes two contributions: first, this paper extends Hoopes et al. 's (2003)”
A Review of Approaches to Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm† (2007, background): “Arguably, methodological ambiguity may be a primary reason why the models underlying the empirical literature remain seemingly “disjointed” (Hoopes et al., 2003: 890).”
Inter-Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage (2004, background): “However, the phenomenon of inter-firm relations is perspicously under-explored within the resource-and competence-based literature (Das/Teng 2000; Hoopes et al. 2003).”