Measuring Emotions: Implications of a Multimethod Perspective.

By R. Larsen, Z. Prizmić-Larsen. 2006

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Implications of emotion regulation on young children’s emotional wellbeing and educational achievement (2016, methodology): “Hence the use of multiple methods to assess emotion regulation is essential (Larsen and Prizmic-Larsen 2006) in an attempt to make sense of the discrepant sources of data (Kraemer et al. 2003).”
Measures of emotion: A review (2009, unknown): “Practically speaking, then, the more measures of emotion that are obtained and the better they are tailored to the particular context and research question, the more one will likely learn from a particular study (cf. Larsen & Prizmic-Larsen, 2006).”
Test Anxiety and Physiological Arousal: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2020, background): “Therefore, the purpose of the present review is to address these issues by systematically reviewing and meta-analyzing research findings on the relationship between physiological and self-report measures which traditionally have been considered as benchmarks for assessing emotions (Larsen and Prizmi”