Beyond Competition: Institutional Isomorphism in U.S. Accounting Research

By Brad M. Tuttle, Jesse F. Dillard. 2007

243 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a72e455043652d40c68f8fd5c9a23f43cd20d530

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. C. de Villiers
2. Deborah Alexander
3. S. Jonsson
4. Monica Montecalvo
5. Jesse F. Dillard
6. R. Gray
7. Federica Farneti
8. Eva Boxenbaum

In Management Information Systems

1. C. de Villiers
2. Crawford Spence
3. Jesse F. Dillard
4. Monica Montecalvo
5. R. Gray
6. Federica Farneti
7. Eva Boxenbaum
8. A. Belal

Citations in the corpus

• The potential of integrated reporting to enhance sustainability reporting in the public sector (2018, background): “These forces usually operate simultaneously (Tuttle and Dillard, 2007).”
• Social Accounting Research as If The World Matters (2009, background): “Additionally, it appears that there are conservative tendencies in academe itself (Tuttle and Dillard 2007).”
• Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. (2008, background): “Only few studies have sought to empirically validate this core theoretical statement (e.g., Tuttle & Dillard, 2007; Ashworth et al., 2009; Heugens and Landers 2009), a point to which we will return later.”
• The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting (2014, background): “The NIT literature (DiMaggio & Powell, 1983; Tuttle & Dillard, 2007) suggests that as a field matures, normative isomorphism becomes increasingly important.”