Is this about You or Me? Self-Versus Other-Directed Judgments and Feelings in Response to Intergroup Interaction

By Jacquie D. Vorauer, Sandra M. Kumhyr. 2001

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a69a99edf81ffff6ff3f5f321c391c97e442b2d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. J. Richeson
2. J. N. Shelton
3. Sophie Trawalter
4. John F. Dovidio
5. M. Hebl
6. A. Voci
7. Miles Hewstone
8. Oliver Christ

In Social Psychology

1. Miles Hewstone
2. John F. Dovidio
3. Rhiannon N. Turner
4. J. Richeson
5. S. Gaertner
6. J. N. Shelton
7. A. Voci
8. Gordon Hodson

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Miles Hewstone
2. John F. Dovidio
3. Rhiannon N. Turner
4. S. Gaertner
5. J. Richeson
6. Gordon Hodson
7. J. N. Shelton
8. A. Voci

Citations in the corpus

• Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship (2007, background): “There is evidence that intergroup anxiety leads to suspicion towards the outgroup (Henderson-King & Nisbett, 1996 ), intergroup distrust (Dovidio, Gaertner, Kawakami, & Hodson, 2002 ) and increased concerns for the self (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ).”
• What do the young (old) people think of me? Content and accuracy of age-based metastereotypes (2013, background): “…2001; Vorauer et al., 1998), and that people expect to be viewed in terms of stereotypes of their groups (Krueger, 1996), especially when they anticipate being perceived or evaluated by outgroup (rather than ingroup) members (Pinel, 1999; Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
• Formal and Interpersonal Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants (2002, background): “…stigmatized people can accurately perceive bias and may be attuned to potential signs of this bias in mixed interactions (Kaiser & Miller, 2001; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001) and, as a consequence, have developed coping styles or compensatory repertoires that are activated when they are aware of…”
• Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. (2002, background): “Furthermore, research by Vorauer and Kumhyr (2001) showed that Aboriginal Canadians appeared to personalize the perceived negative behavior of White Canadians during their interaction and experience discomfort and self-directed negative affect (e.g., self-critical, guilty).”
• Interpersonal Concerns in Social Encounters between Majority and Minority Group Members (2003, background): “Despite the assumption in the literature that most Whites are concerned about portraying a non-prejudiced image, there has been little empirical research that examines this interpersonal concern in intergroup interactions (see Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 for an exception).”
• Negotiating Interracial Interactions (2007, background): “Members of dominant groups often experience anxiety during interracial interactions because they are concerned about behaving in prejudiced ways (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001).”
• Why can't we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. (2002, background): “To the extent that Blacks (Shelton, 2000) and other minority group members ( Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ) may, for historical reasons or personal experience, be particularly sensitive to signs of rejection, dislike, or discrimination, they are likely to weigh the negative signals more heavily than the m”
• Threatened identities and interethnic interactions (2006, background): “With respect to racial attitudes, higher-prejudice White Canadians are more likely than lower-prejudice White Canadians to believe that First Nations interaction partners will perceive them meta-stereotypically (Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ; Vorauer et al, 1998 ).”
• Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions (2006, background): “SpeciWcally, research suggests that interracial interactions are especially likely to heighten concerns about appearing prejudiced (Vorauer, Hunter, Main, & Roy, 2000; Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001), and prompt eVorts to avoid doing so (Plant, 2001), for members of dominant racial groups.”
• Brief Report: Thin Slices of Racial Bias (2005, background): “Such judgments are likely to be even more difficult to make during actual interracial interactions (e.g., Vorauer & Kumhyr, 2001 ), given that many factors, including individuals’ goals, influence their nonverbal behavior.”