Interpersonal Concerns in Social Encounters between Majority and Minority Group Members

By J. N. Shelton. 2003

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eb1445469501fa328126a977b347783eb2c34f21

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A lesson in bias: The relationship between implicit racial bias and performance in pedagogical contexts (2016, background): “…1997; Dovidio, Kawakami, & Gaertner, 2002; Fazio Jackson, Dunton, & Williams, 1995; McConnell & Liebold, 2001), concern about how to act or appearing racist (Shelton, 2003; Trawalter, Richeson, & Shelton, 2009) and physiological arousal (Blascovich, Mendes, Hunter, Lickel, & Kowai-Bell, 2001).”
Threatened identities and interethnic interactions (2006, background): “In a series of studies, Richeson and her colleagues have demonstrated that interethnic interactions prompt White Americans to engage in self-regulatory strategies in response to the threat of appearing or behaving in a prejudiced manner (Richeson et al, 2003 ; Richeson & Shelton, 2003 ; Richeson &”
Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions (2006, methodology): “…2000), Richeson and Shelton (2003) predicted that if interracial contact instigates self-regulatory eVort, then White individuals should perform more poorly on tasks that require executive attentional capacity after interracial, compared to after same-race, contact (Richeson & Shelton, 2003).”
Intersectional Oppression: Multiple Stigmatized Identities and Perceptions of Invisibility, Discrimination, and Stereotyping (2018, background): “…understanding felt invisibility may be important for comprehending meta-perceptual outcomes for multiply-stigmatized individuals; for example, for understanding how stereotype concerns shape how multiplystigmatized targets anticipate being judged in cross-group interactions (see Shelton, 2003).”
Cultural distance, mindfulness and passive xenophobia: using Integrated Threat Theory to explore home higher education students’ perspectives on ‘internationalisation at home’ (2009, background): “Pritchard & Skinner, 2002 ; Aberson & Haag, 2007 ; Summers & Volet, 2008 ) have noted that increased intercultural contact can actually increase anxiety and/or decrease confidence in the short‐term while new understanding and identities are constructed, especially where mindfulness (Shelton, 200”
Psychological, Relational, and Emotional Effects of Self-Disclosure After Conversations With a Chatbot (2018, background): “We also measured how much participants “enjoyed” the interaction (Shelton, 2003).”
Acting in Solidarity: Cross‐Group Contact between Disadvantaged Group Members and Advantaged Group Allies (2016, unknown): “…issues of intergroup inequality can be challenging for advantaged group members, who have to deal with anxiety about appearing biased, feelings of embarrassment or guilt about their own privilege, and social norms to avoid “taboo” topics (e.g., Shelton, 2003; Tropp et al., 2006; Vorauer, 2006).”
How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking (2020, background): “While high-status groups are primarily threatened by the idea of appearing prejudiced, low-status groups fear being perceived according to negative stereotypes (see also Shelton, 2003).”
Intergroup Anxiety (2014, background): “…example, intergroup anxiety may lead to more inaccurate responding in situations requiring rapid judgments, such as the Stroop task (see Richeson & Shelton, 2003) or the “shooter bias” task in which people are more likely to mistakenly perceive that an outgroup member has a weapon than an ingroup…”
Derogating the Victim: The Interpersonal Consequences of Blaming Events on Discrimination (2003, result): “Consistent with this argument, Shelton (2003) found that in cross-race interactions, the European American participants expressed more liking for their African American partners than the African American participants expressed for their European American partners.”
Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. (2009, background): “Because of these differing expectations, majority and minority members can experience the same contact situation quite differently (Dixon, Durrheim, & Tredoux, 2005; Shelton, 2003).”
Intergroup anxiety effects on the control of racial stereotypes: A psychoneuroendocrine analysis☆ (2009, methodology): “…hypothesis is speculative and difficult to test directly in humans, it suggests a new explanation for the sustained effects of stress on cognitive control seen in recent work related to intergroup interactions (e.g., Richeson & Shelton, 2003; Richeson & Trawalter, 2005; Trawalter & Richeson, 2006).”
Relationships Between Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Among Minority and Majority Status Groups (2005, background): “In particular, the concerns of members of majority status groups typically involve being perceived as prejudiced by individuals lower in status, whereas the concerns of members of minority status groups involve becoming the target of prejudice from individuals higher in status (see Plant, 2004; Plan”
Speaking With a Nonnative Accent: Perceptions of Bias, Communication Difficulties, and Belonging in the United States (2010, background): “…influences of nonnative accents on speakers and listeners in social context, which is important for understanding stigma generally (Hebl & Dovidio, 2005; Shelton, 2003), is particularly critical for studying nonnative accents because this stigmatizing “mark” is inextricably tied to communication.”