Handbook of Organizational Justice

721 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective. (2009, background): “First, reviews of this literature have already been conducted (Greenberg & Colquitt 2005), and second, we believe that the construct belongs in broader discussion of organizational justice that our review was not intended to address.”
How perceptions of fairness can change (2013, background): “Email: dajones@bsad.uvm.edu about the factors and cognitive processes that influence fairness perceptions (see Greenberg & Colquitt, 2005), researchers have focused almost exclusively on how fairness perceptions form or exist at a single point in time.”
Eyes Wide Open: Perceived Exploitation and Its Consequences (2019, background): “…1994; Rousseau, 1995), low perceived organizational support (e.g., Allen, Shore, & Griffeth, 2003; Eisenberger, Fasolo, & Davis-LaMastro, 1990), distributive injustice (e.g., Greenberg & Colquitt, 2013), and initial theorizing about types of perceived negative employee–organizational relationships.”
Implementing Performance Appraisal: Exploring the Employee Experience (2013, background): “…they are treated by their line manager during this process.1 Procedural and interactional justice have been shown to be associated with organizational commitment, job performance ratings, and trust in line management (Folger & Konovsky, 1989; Greenberg & Colquitt, 2005; McFarlin & Sweeney, 1992).”