Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing

By Gee-Woo Bock, Young-Gul Kim. Information Resources Management Journal, 2002

1,655 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Communication, Information Systems and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a567feb4c93cdb416fda9fd1797533df39a7e1e4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

Citations in the corpus

A measure of knowledge sharing behavior: scale development and validation (2009, background): “Bock & Kim (2002) measured KSB by asking participants how frequently they share different knowledge (reports, official documents, manuals, methodologies, models, experience, know-how, know-where, know-whom, and expertise from education and training) with other members, and how frequently they use…”
An Integrative Model for Knowledge Sharing in Communities-of-Practice (2011, methodology): “The dependent measure, knowledge sharing in CoPs, was adapted from the work of Bock and Kim (2002) to make it appropriate for the CoP context.”
Understanding sustained participation in transactional virtual communities (2012, neutral): “, 2006; Lin, 2007a), and negative effect (Bock and Kim, 2002).”
Determinants Of Knowledge Sharing Behaviors: Developing And Testing An Integrated Theoretical Model (2006, background): “The findings are a great improvement over previous studies on knowledge sharing behaviors (Bock and Kim, 2002; Bock et al., 2005; Ryu et al., 2003; Lin et al., 2004).”
Understanding knowledge management system usage antecedents: An integration of social cognitive theory and task technology fit (2008, background): “7 reward and promotion [10,13,47].”
Impact of knowledge oriented leadership on knowledge management behaviour through employee work attitudes (2019, neutral): “KM is a process of creating, acquiring, transferring, documenting/storing and applying the knowledge (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1995; Rowley, 2000), and it can be practiced at both individual and organizational levels (Bock & Kim, 2002; Yang & Wan, 2004).”
Exploring factors that influence knowledge sharing behavior via weblogs (2010, background): “As well, individuals who trust each other are more willing to share relevant ideas and comprehensive information, as well as to clarify goals and problems with a problem-solving orientation; therefore, it is an important facilitator associated with sharing via online communication (Bock et al., 2005”
Transactional leadership and organizational creativity: Examining the mediating role of knowledge sharing behavior (2017, methodology): “Knowledge sharing behavior (KSB) KSB was measured by a scale developed by Bock and Kim (2002) having 6-items and Cummings (2004). The sample item for the measurement of KSB was “There is much I could learn from colleagues in my workgroup.”
Knowledge-sharing in R&D departments: a social power and social exchange theory perspective (2008, methodology): “Knowledge-sharing behavior (Bock and Kim 2002) 1.”
The Impact of Knowledge Sharing and Innovation upon Sustainable Performance in Islamic Banks: A Mediation Analysis through an SEM Approach (2019, methodology): “Knowledge Sharing of Pakistani Islamic Banks This study reviews and evaluates knowledge sharing in Islamic banks by using five constructs adopted from a previous research study by Bock and Kim (2002), as explained in Table 2.”
The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior (2011, background): “Organizations implement KM initiatives with the expectation that they will result in increased competitive advantage (Alavi and Leidner, 2001; Bock and Kim, 2002; Jones, 2006; Parent et al., 2000; Tiwana, 2002).”