Procedural Justice, Outcome Favorability and Emotion

By Patricia Krehbiel, Russell S. Cropanzano. 2000

233 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a442c3e274d0e8986958a331a84b05b23e38b951

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, INTERACTIONAL JUSTICE, AND TASK PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF INTRINSIC MOTIVATION (2009, methodology): “The procedural justice manipulation therefore varied Leventhal’s (1980) accuracy and consistency rules, with the unjust condition having inaccurate grading that was inconsistent with past sessions.”
Can performance appraisals motivate employees to improve performance? A Mexican study (2012, background): “Organizational researchers have suggested that fairness perceptions can be a source of motivation for employees (Weiss, Suckow and Cropanzano 1999 ; Krehbiel and Cropanzano 2000 ; Cropanzano, Weiss, Suckow and Grandey 2000 ; Cropanzano, Rupp and Byrne 2003 ).”
Self-uncertainty and responsiveness to procedural justice (2005, background): “Recently, however, the assessment of positive affect has been gaining popularity in justice research (Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000; Van den Bos, 2001a; Van den Bos & Spruijt, 2002; Weiss, Suckow, & Cropanzano, 1999), partly due to the acknowledgment that positive and negative affect may produce…”
Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. (2013, background): “In particular, a number of studies have linked the violation of justice rules to state negative affect (e.g., Barclay, Skarlicki, & Pugh, 2005; Goldman, 2003; Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000; Rupp & Spencer, 2006).”
Detrimental Effects of Corruption and Subjective Well-Being (2014, background): “Although at the individual level those who reap positive outcomes from engaging in corruption may have higher SWB (Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000), at the aggregate, we propose that the majority of individuals within a society experiencing the perceived injustices of corruption would have lower SWB.”
Moral Virtues, Fairness Heuristics, Social Entities, and Other Denizens of Organizational Justice. (2001, methodology): “Krehbiel and Cropanzano (2000) obtained similar results.”
Interactional justice and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating role of negative emotions (2012, background): “Negative emotions play a central role in the interactional justice process (Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000; Mikula, Scherer, & Athenstaedt, 1998).”
Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct (2015, background): “As Krehbiel and Cropanzano (2000) point out, “we feel injustice in our gut” (p. 339).”
Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement (2014, unknown): “This prediction has received empirical support (Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000), although there is also evidence of the reversed relation, with self-esteem affecting perceptions of appreciation (Abrams & Hogg, 2001).”
Just Feelings? The Role of Affect in the Formation of Organizational Fairness Judgments (2011, background): “…& Goldman, 2005) and that such reactions catalyze appraisals of injustice that can lead to volatile and potentially damaging behavior in organizations (e.g., Barclay, Skarlicki, & Pugh, 2005; Bies & Tripp, 2001; Goldman, 2003; Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000; Weiss, Suckow, & Cropanzano, 1999).”
Procedural justice policing and citizen compliance behaviour: the importance of emotion (2015, unknown): “The discrete emotions of happiness, joy, anger, frustration, guilt, and anxiety have all been linked to perceptions of procedural justice and injustice (e.g., Krehbiel & Cropanzano, 2000; Weiss, Suckow, & Cropanzano, 1999).”