Procedural Justice, Anger, and Prisoners’ Misconduct

By K. Beijersbergen, Anja Dirkzwager, V. Eichelsheim, P. H. van der Laan, Paul Nieuwbeerta. 2015

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/49dc122660c2d400cc9a1597e85d3e1b8c5a97e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. J. Wooldredge
2. Benjamin M Steiner
3. K. Beijersbergen
4. Paul Nieuwbeerta
5. Anja Dirkzwager

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Benjamin M Steiner
2. J. Wooldredge
3. K. Beijersbergen
4. Paul Nieuwbeerta
5. Anja Dirkzwager
6. Wim Bernasco
7. Arjan A. J. Blokland
8. Alex R. Piquero

Citations in the corpus

• Reoffending After Release (2016, methodology): “, Beijersbergen et al., 2015; Reisig & Mesko, 2009). The observed effect of procedural justice is, however, relatively small. Several factors may explain this relatively small effect. First, the present study was conducted within the Dutch correctional setting. The Netherlands is still known for hav”
• PRISON OFFICER LEGITIMACY, THEIR EXERCISE OF POWER, AND INMATE RULE BREAKING* (2018, background): “respect during the encounter (i.e., procedural justice) perpetrated fewer subsequent nonviolent infractions—a finding consistent with Reisig and Mesko (2009) and with Beuersbergen et al. (2015).”